They don't show the same height. Woo1 users were complaining Xensr giving higher readings. Now Woo2 is giving different readings (closer to Xensr I believe)..kjorn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2017 10:26 pmHow come the woo, piq and xsensor all show the same height?
You say these devices dont work, when just using one shows that they do work. I dont understand what point you are trying to make. You wish they didnt work? You dont believe they work?
How do you think VR and AR work using phones as screens? Sub-millimeter tracking in a 3d space. Using all the sensors you seem to think dont work.
And this proves my point also between Woo1 and Woo2. Same company providing solution for kiteboarding height measuring and they are 10% off from each other which is not "sub-millimeter accuracy you state". Both devices could use same knowhow and software algorithm (sw upgrade to Woo1 to Woo2 level), but Woo was forced to upgrade hardware? Better sensors? Faster CPU? More memory? Bigger battery? Better waterproofing? Or all mentioned?I had 1 hour session and Woo1 shows 27 jumps and Woo 2 77 jumps.
On the highest jump Woo1 7,9 m and Woo2 8,7 m .
Seems like Woo 2 process and record all data faster and more exact while Woo 1 kind of rounding up everything .
Do you get as tired parroting the same thing over and over as we get of hearing you parrot the same thing over and over? please... give it a rest
Was it consistently one position on the board that was higher? Was the one in the centre higher or the other one (it looks like the higher jumps were registered on the Lance profile to me so wondering where this sensor was mounted)
Users browsing this forum: Aleza, BillyGoatGruff, Bing [Bot], CaptainKook, chidism, DanielorDani, decay, drone, duddd, Exage, FunOnTheWater, Gigi;), Google [Bot], i_love_storm, jhonson, Pemba, ronik, suisd12, thatwildtype, womble, Yahoo [Bot] and 559 guests