YEA --Disconnect !
And I did NOT appreciate you changing my post, when you quoted me ; you
completely deleted the quote by LiquidXtasy , that was located between
what i said to you, and the rest of the reply.
Please don't do that again .
Bille
YEA --Disconnect !
YEP -- Not even close .Matteo V wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:19 pmNot even close.
"The Price-Anderson Act became law on Sept. 2, 1957, to cover liability claims of members of the public for personal injury and property damage caused by a commercial nuclear power plant accident. The legislation helped encourage private investment in commercial nuclear power by placing a cap, or ceiling, on the total amount of liability each nuclear power plant licensee faced in the event of an accident. Over time, the "limit of liability" for a nuclear accident has increased the insurance pool to more than $13 billion."
If liability for actual damage from a nuclear disaster was allowed to reach commonly awarded levels in other litigation, we would have no nuclear plants. The money in existence today would not cover the damage, over the 10,000 years or so it takes a nuclear disaster site to become somewhat safe, that an accident could inflict. And no private insurance would ever want to "insure" a nuke plant considering the potential for death and destruction that each plant contains.
So the Govt steps in, says no one can sue beyond this point (monetary value). Or, as in other industries like oil/gas/ammonia pipelines, you simply have a fee that each company pays the Govt for insurance. Then the Govt just steps in and cleans up the mess. And since each company pays the fee anyway, there is little incentive for actually preventing disasters.
So Kamikuza, it is your fault..........and mine......via what we let our elected officials get away with.......which is because no one realizes that it is the LEGISLATION that created the disaster..........not a CEO, company, investors, or "con men"........rather your ignorance....and the ill-informed public as to the real cause of this and every future disaster - us. This is the long way of me telling you where to point that finger.
NOPE! It shows that you edited your referenced post 1 hour after I replied to your post. Your original post did attribute that slur to me, though I believe you did not intend it to.
He said / She said ; and i fucked up by not taking a screen-shot , so no wayMatteo V wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:24 pmNOPE! It shows that you edited your referenced post 1 hour after I replied to your post. Your original post did attribute that slur to me, though I believe you did not intend it to.
Thank you for correcting it after I told you about it. In the future, I will use your entire post as a quote so you cannot revise and try to switch the accusation around. This does clutter up the thread, but it will make things more clear and accurate.
And I cannot edit posts by other users.
Just want to check, are we square on this now?
Again, my mistake. He is innocent. If we make enough people innocent, and just a few people responsible, the world will become a better place where most people can claim they had no part in any governmental policy. In fact, governmental policy is certainly not the responsibility of the people. Government is the bad guys, and we are all innocent. Soon things will get better.....so long as you, and I are not responsible.Bille wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:23 pmYEP -- Not even close .Matteo V wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:19 pmNot even close.
"The Price-Anderson Act became law on Sept. 2, 1957, to cover liability claims of members of the public for personal injury and property damage caused by a commercial nuclear power plant accident. The legislation helped encourage private investment in commercial nuclear power by placing a cap, or ceiling, on the total amount of liability each nuclear power plant licensee faced in the event of an accident. Over time, the "limit of liability" for a nuclear accident has increased the insurance pool to more than $13 billion."
If liability for actual damage from a nuclear disaster was allowed to reach commonly awarded levels in other litigation, we would have no nuclear plants. The money in existence today would not cover the damage, over the 10,000 years or so it takes a nuclear disaster site to become somewhat safe, that an accident could inflict. And no private insurance would ever want to "insure" a nuke plant considering the potential for death and destruction that each plant contains.
So the Govt steps in, says no one can sue beyond this point (monetary value). Or, as in other industries like oil/gas/ammonia pipelines, you simply have a fee that each company pays the Govt for insurance. Then the Govt just steps in and cleans up the mess. And since each company pays the fee anyway, there is little incentive for actually preventing disasters.
So Kamikuza, it is your fault..........and mine......via what we let our elected officials get away with.......which is because no one realizes that it is the LEGISLATION that created the disaster..........not a CEO, company, investors, or "con men"........rather your ignorance....and the ill-informed public as to the real cause of this and every future disaster - us. This is the long way of me telling you where to point that finger.
I'm quite certain, that Kamikuza, is NOT a citizen of the USA ?
He lives on the Other side of the Pacific !!
Bille
I totally agree !Matteo V wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:32 pmAgain, my mistake. He is innocent. If we make enough people innocent, and just a few people responsible, the world will become a better place where most people can claim they had no part in any governmental policy. In fact, governmental policy is certainly not the responsibility of the people. Government is the bad guys, and we are all innocent. Soon things will get better.....so long as you, and I are not responsible.Bille wrote: ↑Sun Feb 25, 2018 5:23 pmYEP -- Not even close .Matteo V wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:19 pm
Not even close.
"The Price-Anderson Act became law on Sept. 2, 1957, to cover liability claims of members of the public for personal injury and property damage caused by a commercial nuclear power plant accident. The legislation helped encourage private investment in commercial nuclear power by placing a cap, or ceiling, on the total amount of liability each nuclear power plant licensee faced in the event of an accident. Over time, the "limit of liability" for a nuclear accident has increased the insurance pool to more than $13 billion."
If liability for actual damage from a nuclear disaster was allowed to reach commonly awarded levels in other litigation, we would have no nuclear plants. The money in existence today would not cover the damage, over the 10,000 years or so it takes a nuclear disaster site to become somewhat safe, that an accident could inflict. And no private insurance would ever want to "insure" a nuke plant considering the potential for death and destruction that each plant contains.
So the Govt steps in, says no one can sue beyond this point (monetary value). Or, as in other industries like oil/gas/ammonia pipelines, you simply have a fee that each company pays the Govt for insurance. Then the Govt just steps in and cleans up the mess. And since each company pays the fee anyway, there is little incentive for actually preventing disasters.
So Kamikuza, it is your fault..........and mine......via what we let our elected officials get away with.......which is because no one realizes that it is the LEGISLATION that created the disaster..........not a CEO, company, investors, or "con men"........rather your ignorance....and the ill-informed public as to the real cause of this and every future disaster - us. This is the long way of me telling you where to point that finger.
I'm quite certain, that Kamikuza, is NOT a citizen of the USA ?
He lives on the Other side of the Pacific !!
Bille
So long as the far left and far right are balanced in voting power, the middle typically/effectively dictates policy or at least "changing of the guard" to some degree.