knotwindy wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 2:07 pm
Not to put to fine a point on it but it sounds like you enjoy practicing wordy debate tactics far more than you care about learning or information. And no, I won’t debate you about this. Just saying what it sounds like to me.
I appreciate the criticism, thus I will honor you desire to not make that into a debate. And it is often noted that my explanations are "TL;DR". I personally feel that this is due to my tackling issues that are of a complicated enough manner that they defy simple explanations. The reality could definitely be other wise, as all knowledge which a single human being has access to, is limited. Thus by debating the measurable evidence and discussing the underlying mechanics, I (or anyone with pertinent info) can contribute to understanding by working to eliminate some of the erroneous positions held by those "for or against" in a particular debate. This topic, as an example, still has most watching this thread uninterested or unable to grasp the underlying concept. "Two medias interacted with" in sailing vs "one media interacted with" in flight, is the core concept which seems somewhat difficult to understand even for those who have experience in sailing, kitesurfing, and flying. As far as the political issues in this topic - those I will leave to others to express their "feelings" on.
This topic happens to be one where I understand, and am willing to try to explain, a portion or key concept, which is counter intuitive to most. For the majority of the threads on this forum, I typically lack any knowledge to share beyond what has already been shared. And for some threads, specifically when I am asking a question, I lack pretty much all knowledge on the topic and am seeking to learn from the debate of others.
And again, criticism accepted and appreciated.