Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

The Pansh A15, an A18 review

For all foil kite riders


Kiter_from_Germany
Medium Poster
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 8:39 am
Kiting since: 4
Local Beach: Northern Sea, Netherlands
Style: intermediate Twin, beginner Wave
Gear: Tubes: North Dice 10,ozone catalyst 14, Slingshot Turbine 17m and others
Foil: pansh A15 12m, 18m
Gear: Anton MTrain, (strapless) Directionals
Brand Affiliation: none

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby Kiter_from_Germany » Sun Jul 01, 2018 10:51 pm

Hi,
impressive how agile this thread goes...
Last edited by Kiter_from_Germany on Mon Jul 02, 2018 5:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

foilholio
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:20 am
Kiting since: 1337
Local Beach: Ventura Beach
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa
Style: Airstyle
Gear: Foils
Brand Affiliation: None

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby foilholio » Mon Jul 02, 2018 1:16 am

Yes it is much easier to develop smaller kite than bigger.
kitexpert wrote: Foilholio, you should give a general description from what you have done and what are the goals and what is the reasoning behind your modifications. And a bit more specific level than "to make kite turn better", "to have better high end" or what ever nice wishes.
This has been said before, but I guess it has been lost in many posts. Changes now from stock I have are 3:1 mixer, no C bridles, move and shortened 2 tip B bridles to C (yes technically some of C then still exists lol), shorten Z. Previously I had just shortened Z and used a WAC line. That large previous post was just a reply to someone explaining how I went about my latest changes, so they could too.

Intention is simply to improve the kite for my riding style. Over stock I have observed a faster kite, tighter easier turning, shorter bar throw, easier relaunch, moderate( for foil user not tube) bar pressure. One of the main objectives was to improve bar throw, and it achieves that thoroughly. Turning and response I would view as coming mainly from that. Speed increase from loosing the C bridles, I observed in the exact same wind, C bridles on the kite but disabled then 2 mins later no C bridles at all, speed increase was definitely observable but not massive. A speed gun, or something to measure speed on the kite would have been helpful if I did this for work.
kitexpert wrote: I don't think any 9m kite owner will make similar mods as yours based on 18m kite, even if there is a "bridle size conversion table" available.
This is a silly assertion you make. I have used bridle conversion before and it works quite well. This mod deals mainly with the mixer. Most likely all A15 Pansh mixers are the same. But even if they are not then careful restoration, of the AB limit and the mixer setting will have the kite close to as before. Then Merely adjusting Z and tip C will get things right. Sure a 9m and 18m are quite different but, the adjust between won't be that great.

The funny thing as well you design in kite CAD and that only uses bridle conversion to make different sizes. You are basically saying your design process doesn't work!
kitexpert wrote: Best is if you could show a drawing using original line plan picture of A15, it really is too arduous to dig what you are suggesting from your long posts.
Pictures would be much easier, but if a person wants to do the mod they can from what I wrote. To me it is quite simple, but I have much more experience than most. Aswell what I wrote is more help than I have ever received!

kitexpert wrote: One problem is when whole line row is taken away loads for the rest attachment points increase and something can fail.
Well observed by C before going slack, plus understanding of low wing loading at that area and B and Z are already close, then we can very reasonably make the guess C had very low loading. Loading is then passed to B and Z, which are of the same construction of A and A will still have higher loading. Z is also particularly low loading and can take more. There are LCLs, and I don't have much reason to think a structural failure will be a problem. A main which was a problem is now doubled as well!
kitexpert wrote: So there is no more C line row, then how much B is pulled?
Yes amazing C is gone and my original thoughts when I first saw the kite that it could go are proven correct! I believe I have used the same B(Z) setting as before, but will have to check. I did change it around a bit while testing things. AB limit is the same, I tried longer originally but I was trying to get WAC working and with the reduced mixer travel I had trouble. I gave up on WAC with this mixer it is not really compatible.

User avatar
gmasiak
Rare Poster
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:47 pm
Kiting since: 2009
Local Beach: Skyway Bridge in Saint Petersburg , Fl
Favorite Beaches: Lido Beach in Sarasota, FL
Anna Maria Beach, North Desoto Beach
Style: Freeride, Foiling
Gear: Lift Foils 110 and 150 with Zeeko AirRace board.
Pulsion UL 12m ,OR Flite kites.
Brand Affiliation: None

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby gmasiak » Mon Jul 02, 2018 2:05 pm

Thank you foilholio for all the information. This looks very advanced tune up for me... I'm not on this level yet :)

foilholio
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:20 am
Kiting since: 1337
Local Beach: Ventura Beach
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa
Style: Airstyle
Gear: Foils
Brand Affiliation: None

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby foilholio » Mon Jul 02, 2018 2:19 pm

Np , In my mind and implementation it is quite simple for me. Typing it out is complicated. If I did a couple of pictures it could be much simpler. Sorry about that. I will look at doing something better once I am more final.

foilholio
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:20 am
Kiting since: 1337
Local Beach: Ventura Beach
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa
Style: Airstyle
Gear: Foils
Brand Affiliation: None

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby foilholio » Wed Jul 11, 2018 12:44 pm

Tested the kite more. Very good, enough of an improvement to call this A15 Version 2 or Version 6 or something in LEI speak :-) The improved feel at the bar and shorter throw really helps. Upwind is quite improved, I put it down to the reduced bridles and reduced camber. Stability, particularly tips seems really good, much better than my previous setup. I see no issue dropping the C bridle at all, it is absolutely not needed. Kite floats much better, weight reduction is noticeable. I think anyone that tries this mod will be quite impressed.

2 easy paths for further changes now, adding back in B tip bridle which should improve turn a bit, but may destabilize the tip, and flatten Z by adding tip extensions, which will improve performance, increase tip stability, may reduce turn. Hopefully someone else joins in to try some of this.

kitexpert
Frequent Poster
Posts: 495
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:20 pm
Kiting since: 2003
Gear: many kites, also diy
Brand Affiliation: None

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby kitexpert » Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:17 pm

If you pull B 1:3, it is more than original 1:4. It means camber of the kite is decreased when AoA is increased (bar sheeted in). It does not make much sense, usually it is meant that camber increases when AoA increases, because it gives more lift.

It is difficult to understand how decreased camber could improve upwind. Generally kite with lower camber flies slower and sits deeper in the window. To tweak kite to lower camber is even worse because it generates excessive drag.

Stability may be better if there is some tension in B all the time, however this help is not necessary there when it is most needed. If Z is lengthened in the wingtip area turning of the kite will suffer.

foilholio
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:20 am
Kiting since: 1337
Local Beach: Ventura Beach
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa
Style: Airstyle
Gear: Foils
Brand Affiliation: None

Re: The Pansh A15, an A18 review

Postby foilholio » Wed Jul 11, 2018 11:22 pm

Yes the ratio increase will reduce camber. It is easy to compensate changing settings but because I dropped WAC and kept old settings camber is now lower, I have always found lower camber to have better upwind. Usually minimal tension in Z, I would say not enough to distort it is best. Flysurfer would agree with me, from their statements on it. If you read about lower camber, negative camber, use of negative flaps, you will understand more about how they increase lift to drag. Drag is directly related to Lift and higher camber produces more lift and with it drag. There is of course the problem then that low camber may not give sufficient lift to even kite, water start etc. This is were foils are great because you can choose. Things like a camber adjusting bar would be great for racing. High camber for transitions, water start and downwind,then low camber for upwind.

The intention with lengthening Z at the tip is to improve efficiency, i.e. reduce drag. The stability increase does allow Z to be shortened overall more, which equals more lift. Overall I would say it is a performance or stability seeking mod with turning as victim.

Turning is a strange obsession with Tube kiters and their designers. Funny because their best kiters, their pro wakestylers, don't like kites that turn fast lol. Most kiting is in a strait line after all. Sure pretending to ride waves with turns on flat water in front of waves ( for pictures) or on lakes ,well that needs a fast turning kite. Loops are also easier the faster a kite turns, but not many kiters can or do them. Surfing needs no kite, especially not one that turns fast. Though it is nicer to connect sections and make changes with a faster kite, though not necessary. Often with full slack lines there is no quick response from any kite. You are at the mercy of the wave like proper surfing.


Return to “Foil Kites”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TomW and 5 guests