If you're making arguments like this you don't know what you're talking about.tegirinenashi wrote:The idea of splitting surface area into numerous fins is flawed. Suppose, 4 fins are better than 2. Then, perhaps 10 fins are even better than 4? Where does this proposition end?
Yup, on a quad it takes out some of the "skateness" or looseness. On my Nano I really like ridding H3 quads with a 5th knubster http://www.surffcs.com/shop/surf-specia ... s-knubsterOnthewater860 wrote:Has anyone tried a stubby 5th fin?
+1000TomW wrote:There's a lot more design factors, fin placement : relatively on board, relatively to each other, toe in. Then fin sizes, templates, foils and flex of fin. Then there's the boards design variables....everything is interdependent.
No one will ever be able to give you an answer.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], SaltWaterDog and 16 guests