tegirinenashi wrote:The idea of splitting surface area into numerous fins is flawed. Suppose, 4 fins are better than 2. Then, perhaps 10 fins are even better than 4? Where does this proposition end?
Onthewater860 wrote:Has anyone tried a stubby 5th fin?
TomW wrote:There's a lot more design factors, fin placement : relatively on board, relatively to each other, toe in. Then fin sizes, templates, foils and flex of fin. Then there's the boards design variables....everything is interdependent.
No one will ever be able to give you an answer.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Bushflyr and 16 guests