Well said, but James Lovelock is not really a good example for good science...An important understanding of the scientific process is the ability to reexamine and reevaluate the evidence.
Users browsing this forum: basti52406, bittersvolcom, Blackened, cglazier, chidism, Da Yoda, Google [Bot], jjm, Kemperman, Leon van Bergen, lightwind, Manxman, Pitu, Rob112, thatwildtype, Yahoo [Bot] and 840 guests