Forum for kitesurfers
-
not2oldyet
- Rare Poster
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:31 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Canada
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby not2oldyet » Thu May 17, 2007 1:15 pm
Why did they stop making the UFO SOF-X 3 line kite. Are they dangerous?
-
AdrenalinDriven
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:09 pm
- Style: Wakestyle
- Gear: Those dangerous C shaped ones
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby AdrenalinDriven » Thu May 17, 2007 8:16 pm
Why would anybody want a three line kite? Can you draw a picture? I see no logical way that would be beneficial
-
scklandl
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1603
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:49 am
- Style: all
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: scott klandl burlington, VT
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
2 times
Postby scklandl » Thu May 17, 2007 9:42 pm
ALL our kites are "three liners" (a minor exception could be debated for those with an active fifthline system but I dont count that cuz its a ridiculous/ retarded/ reDUMBdant/ and ineffcient system)
SOFX was trying to catch the anti 5 line backlash so they basically made a Y bridle shorter than anyone elses system and called it a three line kite. No its no any more dangerous than any other kite unless put in the wrong hands. Its still a CL depowerable C kite like anyother from 05 (06??)
-
not2oldyet
- Rare Poster
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:31 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Canada
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby not2oldyet » Thu May 17, 2007 10:59 pm
thanks for the info- better safe than sorry
-
jakemoore
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 2520
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 3:59 am
- Kiting since: 2003
- Gear: More wing than kite
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Oleander
-
Has thanked:
146 times
-
Been thanked:
295 times
-
Contact:
Postby jakemoore » Fri May 18, 2007 12:27 am
What boggles me even more is why Flysurfer went from 3 to 4 lines. I thought having only 3 lines was great. You do need a fatter centerline.
Jake
-
not2oldyet
- Rare Poster
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:31 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Canada
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby not2oldyet » Fri May 18, 2007 1:43 am
this is the case on the UFO the centre line is much thicker. Thing is i never recd. any instructions about the outside lines and i keep getting conflicting information; some say its not a safe kite that its too hard to land, that it turns slow that the bladders burst and others say its a good kite. I inflated the kite and it seems like its well built could there have been some improvements in the kites that were sewn in the latter part of 2006.
-
surfingwithkites
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 9:29 pm
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby surfingwithkites » Fri May 18, 2007 2:06 am
I saw a three line kite in new cal. Looked very stable but turning was really slow. Maybe that is the problem?
-
munteruk
- Frequent Poster
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:00 pm
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Sydney Australia
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby munteruk » Fri May 18, 2007 4:06 am
surfingwithkites wrote:I saw a three line kite in new cal. Looked very stable but turning was really slow. Maybe that is the problem?
If the Y bridle is short and the single line long then the kite has a tendency to rock around the intersection of the Y. I think this slows down the turning because it allows the kite to rocking doesn't cause the kite to turn as effectively as distorting/twisting the canopy with steering line tension.
AFAIK, the other issue with a three liner is that you lose the ability to flag out onto a front line safety. Depending on the design of the kite and the attitude of the company, this could be a show-stopper.
Return to “Kitesurfing”