Forum for kitesurfers
-
theflyingtinman
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2003 11:45 pm
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: California
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby theflyingtinman » Fri Feb 08, 2008 2:55 am
-
gonewiththewind
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 9:23 pm
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby gonewiththewind » Fri Feb 08, 2008 3:31 am
Yes, looks good. But they never do say what kind of video format it uses. The fact that it uses half as much storage space to shoot an hour of video as something like the Pentax Optio W30 does is not a good sign though. The video from that camera is already pretty crappy for anything other than YouTube.
-
Greg7
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:04 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Florida Keys
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby Greg7 » Fri Feb 08, 2008 5:01 am
gonewiththewind wrote:Yes, looks good. But they never do say what kind of video format it uses. The fact that it uses half as much storage space to shoot an hour of video as something like the Pentax Optio W30 does is not a good sign though. The video from that camera is already pretty crappy for anything other than YouTube.
In all fairness they do give you several video examples.
For that cheap you can't really beat it.
Having said that, I have a new Sea Pro water proof 6 megapixel camera and the images are crap.
You get what you pay for
Return to “Kitesurfing”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Adventure Logs, andrzej351, Exal, Gigi;), Google [Bot], mati, Pepijn, plasma180, purdyd, Sander O, suisd12 and 365 guests