Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Fuel vs RPM

Forum for kitesurfers
Gnarfskt
Medium Poster
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 4:13 pm
Style: Jumping
Gear: Cabrinha Crossbow
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Fuel vs RPM

Postby Gnarfskt » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:22 am

Benefits and drawbacks with these two kites? Anone who have tried them both who can give me an honest comparison of these two models? I´m thinking of things such as steering, hang time, kiteloop performance, water relaunch, etc...

FarQueLot
Medium Poster
Posts: 167
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 2:37 am
Gear: Ozone,Slingshot,my own
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: Labia
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby FarQueLot » Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:09 pm

Smooth winds the fuel rocks, otherwise the RPM is the go, have a mixed quiver mainly RPM's but always have a 9 fuel in my quiver, sweetest kite ever, but will punish you in the gusts.
The RPM is a Fuel with manners but the excitometer is turned down a little.
The relaunch on the rpm is great, the fuel is ok - if you have used c kites before you will be impressed by the fuel.
The Fuel is the best flying kite I have tried and others always leave me wanting, once you are in sync with it there are no performance deficiencies.
luv
f

frankm1960
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1229
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:48 pm
Local Beach: -Bayshore, at the end sea st. on saint John's west side, bay of fundy.
-Saints rest beach, at the end of sandy point road, irving nature park, saint john, west side.
Gear: Kites: 12m LF Mig, 9m LF Mig, 5m SS Fuel
Boards: LF proof 151cm, Real Wind 144cm, home made light wind board 160 x 50
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby frankm1960 » Tue Jun 05, 2012 4:29 pm

Here's a recent thread on the same topic...
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2375529&p=746992&hi ... pm#p746992

Here's one on the RPM alone...
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2374652&p=740045&hi ... pm#p740045

Hope they help you out.

On a side note ... any one explain the front line settings on the fuel (surf, freeride, wave) and how they affect the kite's power, turning and wind range? Tried to find a manual but no luck :)

can
Rare Poster
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:00 pm
Local Beach: kilyos, gokova, datca
Favorite Beaches: gokova, datca
Style: freestyle
Gear: north 's C 2008 12m2
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby can » Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:37 pm

they have same open canopy shape.

rpm = fuel + bridles

jedi1
Frequent Poster
Posts: 395
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:41 pm
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: Poland
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby jedi1 » Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:53 pm

frankm1960 wrote: On a side note ... any one explain the front line settings on the fuel (surf, freeride, wave) and how they affect the kite's power, turning and wind range? Tried to find a manual but no luck :)
Two settings on Fuel called wake and freestyle.

Wake setting means more grunt, more low-end power, slower turning, less depower, more pull during turns, more bar pressure.

Freestyle setting means the opposite :wink:

It is the same on every kite though. The closer you attach the front lines to the wing, tip the deeper the the kite sits in the wind window (wake setting) with all the consequences of it.

bortola
Rare Poster
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:21 pm
Local Beach: Midwest
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: MidWest - USA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby bortola » Wed Jun 06, 2012 12:09 am

Both are excellent SS products.

Many things to consider when selecting one or another.

Size:
If you look for a light wind kite between both get the 14m RPM. The 13m Fuel is what you would ride if you were 220lbs when everyone else is on 12/11m.

If you want a high wind kite then it all comes to your ability to handle the gusts. If the wind you have is gusty I would go with the RPM.

Riding Style:
If you want to perform unhooked tricks then the fuel is a no brainer. The RPM is nice too by with the Fuel you don't have to trim at all which is a convenience.

Loops: I found both somewhat similar with the fuel getting deeper into the power zone.

Speed: Both Kites are relatively slow when into wakestyle setting. I didn't like the RPM into freestyle setting (not a lot of low end power).

Quiver: If you plan to have just 2 kites I would go with the RPM since it has more range (8M and 14m)

I personally have a quiver of Fuels and sometimes use a 12m and 6m RPM. I love my fuels and they are my first choice.

User avatar
dandaka
Frequent Poster
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:33 pm
Local Beach: Kaliningrad, Russia
Favorite Beaches: Boracay, Philippines / Mui Ne, Vietnam
Style: unhooked / newschool / wakestyle
Gear: North Vegas 12m² 2012
North Vegas 9m² 2010
North Vegas 7m² 2010
North Team Series 131cm 2011
Mystic Warrior III Len10 2012
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby dandaka » Wed Jun 06, 2012 1:27 pm

I've tested Fuel 2011 7m² and RPM 2012 9m².

Fuel has incredible slack after you get in the air — really nice for handlepasses. Relaunch is quite difficult comparing to RPM.

kitecozumel
Frequent Poster
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:48 pm
Local Beach: all Cozumel locations
Favorite Beaches: anywhere with wind and waves
Style: professional
Gear: Slingshot
Brand Affiliation: Slingshot
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby kitecozumel » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:51 pm

Fuels are one of the fastest relaunching C kites. Enough to challenge any "bow" kite :lol:

User avatar
dandaka
Frequent Poster
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:33 pm
Local Beach: Kaliningrad, Russia
Favorite Beaches: Boracay, Philippines / Mui Ne, Vietnam
Style: unhooked / newschool / wakestyle
Gear: North Vegas 12m² 2012
North Vegas 9m² 2010
North Vegas 7m² 2010
North Team Series 131cm 2011
Mystic Warrior III Len10 2012
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby dandaka » Wed Jun 06, 2012 3:55 pm

Can't understand, why people always compare Fuel to other C-kites when talking about relaunch.

Question is "Fuel vs RPM", and answer is "relaunch on Fuel sucks". Maybe its better than some other C-kites, but who cares?

User avatar
Laughingman
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2979
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:35 pm
Local Beach: Kettle Point, Mitchell's Bay, Rondeau Bay
Favorite Beaches: Kettle Point, Mitchell's Bay, Rondeau Bay, Long Bay, Cayo Guillermo, La Ventana
Gear: Ocean Rodeo Gen6 Flites 10m, 12m Gen2 Roams 6m and 8m, Cloud D 4.8, 6.2, 8.0, 10.4
Xeon Laluz, Mako Wide 150, Jellyfish Custom surf board quad fin 6', LF Impulse Foil and Kanaha Shapes 37" board
Engine Harness with slider
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Fuel vs RPM

Postby Laughingman » Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:16 pm

All I know is that if you do not have Fuel, you will not be making any RPMs....:P


Return to “Kitesurfing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], bshmng, ChielSter, Chriz76, Clarencephil, Clem, cor, droffats, Exal, fly62, Hasse, Hessel, IDAVIS, jsanzperez, knotwindy, lezo, Pepijn, rw30, Sander O, thewindego, tilmann, Windigo1, Windwarrior, Yahoo [Bot] and 608 guests