Low end is a bit less but high end is better, this compared to my previous sle-c kites such as the zeeko krush, ocean rodeo razor/cypher, ozone c4. So pretty much the same range.jumarcil wrote:As much range.... yeah right .....Frank82 wrote:Except that C kites have been refined a lot since 2008, the kites now have as much range as the typical SLE freestyle kite and depower better with some board skills.paulie wrote:2008 is calling.. It wants its forum thread back...
Going back to C-Kites. SLEs are inferior for freestyle
-
Frank82
- Frequent Poster
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:19 pm
- Local Beach: Wijk aan Zee, IJburg, Schellinkhout, Medemblik - Netherlands
- Style: freestyle / wakestyle / big air / wave
- Gear: Eleveight
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: Going back to C-Kites. SLEs are inferior for freestyle
-
paulie
- Frequent Poster
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:02 pm
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Going back to C-Kites. SLEs are inferior for freestyle
I actually meant the discussion about C kites being better than bow Kites. I thought that discussion died years ago.Frank82 wrote:Except that C kites have been refined a lot since 2008, the kites now have as much range as the typical SLE freestyle kite and depower better with some board skills.paulie wrote:2008 is calling.. It wants its forum thread back...
My 2008 Vegas's had as much top end as any bridled sle. Toliet bottom end though.
Now I am waiting for someone to say a Vegas isn't a C Kite because it had a loaded 5th line...
