DWX wrote: ↑Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:03 pm
An opinion doesn’t have to lack objectivity, in fact the more valuable form of communication is trans-objective (a psychoanalytic term that stands for objects that are experienced as both outside and inside the “subject, like a teddy bear in childhood); Biblical hermeneutics introduces a mode of thinking that is neither objective nor subjective, which are Classical Greek philosophical terms and very far from our lived social reality...
Do you really wanna bore everyone here with a philosophical discussion of the principles of communicative action in scientific publishing, of which you clearly have no clue?
Take it or leave it: we would love to see a more balanced representation of style in marketing and advertising and we love personality as much if not more than handlepasses.... that’s all folks
Not really a philosophical discussion at all.
I am merely saying that if people state as a fact that one style is unhealthy or more unhealthy than another style, they should really be able to back that up with a little more than "I have talked to pro riders". Thats like me stating the earth is flat, I know because I talked to some smart people about it.
The same goes for stating that 1 in 50 of an otherwise undefined "average joe kiter" does not give a f***.
That "
you would love to see a more balanced representation of style in marketing and advertising and
you love personality as much if not more than handlepasses.... that’s all folks", is perfectly fine and a lot people might share this opinion.
Personally I pretty much like to do and watch all styles of kitesurfing,