Just shortly, some thoughts after Dan remarks.
Wow, i did knew that this movie done by 18 years old guy. In this case it' master piece ! I think no one will consider how all visual side is good, itls simply perfect. Still people there talking about content and aim of movie. I earlier wrote that its post hypster movie (i did knew details of author age), and i immediately felt there another kind of aesthetic look and reflection in this movie. Now i full understand that i was found comming new generation, which aim is not to reflect something in contect, aim is itself just as aim. Or as moto - dont take all around seriuosly, even content of art, its not matter, we obviously living in visual culture age, text or hearing ages was in past
Second: we all know was famous book- partisan marketing. So, seems that this movie is direct example of it. Maybe even masterpiece:)
Third -angry. Yes, its now very unpopular in good western mentality now, seems that you cannot be angry, simple cannot, because its very low level. But i think people can be angry and have right to bee and reflect it, it's natural. And these comments great reflecting what people dont like in styles of riding and pushing.
4th- still for me somehow from all kite movies kept in memory mostly Ruben Lenten and his storm seeking/kiting episodes. And of course hisory of kiteboarding. Reflection is that still despite visual side, content is most important.
And personally for Noe, you did really very good movie at your age, dont react to sensous to all our comments. Do movies, you have talent for sure.