How so? The term "racist" has been changed (by certain academia) to exclude some forms of bigotry previously considered racism. This has lead to certain types of obvious racism being excluded from being considered wrong. While at the same time, new forms of racism are being created/redefined to be based on the inherent racial identity of the accused. Thus there are some serious problems with "logical consistency" in calling someone a racist in most circumstances if using these new definitions. So, any accusation of racism needs to be qualified in the present time so its validity can be evaluated based on whether or not you accept the standard definition or the new ones. And please present evidence when accusing someone of this as it will help with qualifying the accusation.
jumptheshark wrote: ↑Mon Jun 25, 2018 3:52 pmOhhhhh, you want examples??
I get it. Your still pretty new here.... 15 months in and all. You might not have picked up on it yet!
He's an a$$hole.
And as evidence, I would like to submit his entire body of work as presented here on this handily searchable forum.
search.php?keywords=&terms=all&author=m ... mit=Search
By no means will you need to read very much.
Users browsing this forum: ELI and 14 guests