gotKite wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:07 am
I can't believe you're calling scientists "extremists". And of course you don't want to communicate with the scientific community because they would easily disprove what you're saying.
Any trained scientist who would falsify data is an extremist. No amount of fear of the future should ever sway a rational left or right leaning person from the truth to the point where they cherry pick data, "modify data", blatantly falsify data, or use propaganda and threats to prove your make their case.
None of those challenges, of which there are many examples like the Brazil temps, have been addressed in a rational way.
So yes, there are extremist scientists that have a definite emotional, monetary, and political agenda.
But outside of anthropogenic climate change, there have been many other examples of scientists going to extreme's to prove they are right. From the Polio vaccine to Nuclear power, science is sold to the public by those who wish to profit and "be correct".
Unfortunately, the jury is not just out or still being selected in the anthropogenic climate change debate, humans are still examining the case for enough evidence to be able to present.