Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

A forum dedicated to Hydrofoil riders
User avatar
vol
Frequent Poster
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 6:18 pm
Local Beach: Tarifa Spain
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa Spain, Prassonisi Rhodes, Brazil Taiba-Cumbucu-Paracuru
Style: hydrofoil, bigair, freestyle
Gear: Saul Custom Boards
Location: Tarifa Spain
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby vol » Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:24 pm

my latest wing 5% thickness, n-10 profile, ar 3, 600x200mm , ~900cm2
low speed is very good, top speed is good (depends on stab)
what is different? feels like wing cutting the water like a knife, very smooth riding in the waves
Last edited by vol on Tue Mar 24, 2020 7:58 am, edited 3 times in total.

Europ2
Frequent Poster
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 7:51 pm
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby Europ2 » Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:32 pm

vol wrote:
Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:24 pm
my latest wing 5% thickness, n-10 profile, ar 3, 600x200mm , ~900cm2
low speed is very good, top speed is good (depends on stab)
what is different? feels like wing cutting the water like a knife, very smooth riding in the waves
I wouldn't have thought that one could go as low as 5% ? Which fiber (Carbon or glass) and which filler have you used ?
n-10 ? What is exactly your airfoil section ? Is it the NACA 2410 thinned down from 10 to 5% ?
Would you have any pictures of the manufacturing process ?
kiteykitekite wrote:
Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:32 am
5% Thickness :-) You be making most kite designers irate.
I think you have forgotten you are on the Hydrofoil forum so we are designing hydrofoil wings and not kite wings :D

bohme
Rare Poster
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 12:01 pm
Local Beach: Ringkøbing
Favorite Beaches: Hvide Sande
Style: Foiling
Gear: Worn
Brand Affiliation: DIY
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby bohme » Tue Mar 24, 2020 5:43 pm

vol wrote:
Mon Mar 23, 2020 10:24 pm
my latest wing 5% thickness, n-10 profile, ar 3, 600x200mm , ~900cm2
low speed is very good, top speed is good (depends on stab)
what is different? feels like wing cutting the water like a knife, very smooth riding in the waves
I like this :-)
Scaling an n-10 to 5% is not a bad choice.
The lower drag coefficient almost compensates for the bigger area.

My latest wing:
Front: 10% thickness, NACA2410, 710x145mm , ~800cm2
Rear: 10% thickness, NACA2410, 430x62mm , ~215cm2
(photo below)
It is so much easier than my old racefoils. Top speed is not much more than 22kn, but my VMG's are just as good as my racefoils.
Attachments
Annotation 2020-03-24 162523.jpg
Annotation 2020-03-24 162523.jpg (120.4 KiB) Viewed 1056 times
20200324_161330 (Large)2.jpg

User avatar
vol
Frequent Poster
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 6:18 pm
Local Beach: Tarifa Spain
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa Spain, Prassonisi Rhodes, Brazil Taiba-Cumbucu-Paracuru
Style: hydrofoil, bigair, freestyle
Gear: Saul Custom Boards
Location: Tarifa Spain
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby vol » Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:23 pm

Europ2 wrote:
Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:32 pm
I wouldn't have thought that one could go as low as 5% ? Which fiber (Carbon or glass) and which filler have you used ?
n-10 ? What is exactly your airfoil section ? Is it the NACA 2410 thinned down from 10 to 5% ?
Would you have any pictures of the manufacturing process ?
because it is my 3rd wing, a little prehistory:
The first wing was monofoil, airfoil 2410, 10% thickness and very low AR approx 1000cm2, was really nice, pretty good control, nice rideable, but after few sessions I decided to rebuild it, I removed wing bottom and made it flat, surprisingly but wing performance was improved, was faster, less drag but the same good low speed, plus one unexpectable benefit, when the wing above the water sliding much easier and more control. Later I built additional fuselage with rear wing because mono for me was too much stabless, I like more dynamic riding and jumps.

The second wing, nothing special, hi ar, N-10 airfoil 8% approx 550cm2, 80%-20% glass-carbon, nice speed, stable in strong condition but low speed not good... For this wing also rebuilt boddy-rear-wing, added some layers of carbon because it was too flex.

The latest wing I build inspired dolphin fin, made it with plywood core and fiberglass because of chipper, used tons of glass :D 2x625 triaxial for one side, at the mast body 3x layers, the wing is very strong because I like jumps.
airfoil is N-10 5% http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=n10-il
At this moment I tested with previous rear wing-body, the new one rear wing is also N-10 5% but I can't try it because of carnitine...

Wings are built by press tech because I have lots of twintipe and wakeboards building experience.
The core is wood, for the first wing used paulownia, latest wings with a plywood core, all layers are collected and pressed for couple hours in 60 Celcius.
This process eliminates unwanted epoxy resin and providing the strongest and lightest construction, for example, the first wing version with extra body and rear wing was 800g only, the latest foil is twice heavier but is crazy durable, carbon can be less than 1kg
bohme wrote:
I like this :-)
Scaling an n-10 to 5% is not a bad choice.
The lower drag coefficient almost compensates for the bigger area.

My latest wing:
Front: 10% thickness, NACA2410, 710x145mm , ~800cm2
Rear: 10% thickness, NACA2410, 430x62mm , ~215cm2
(photo below)
It is so much easier than my old racefoils. Top speed is not much more than 22kn, but my VMG's are just as good as my racefoils.
Thanks!
Your wing looks nice :thumb:
I see you use aerodynamic calculations, but think, air is 784 times less dense than water! I don't know how many times forces are different but definitely are.

some pics from proccess
IMG_20200128_150545.jpg
Paulownia core
IMG_20200128_151345.jpg
Paulownia core
IMG_20200131_161557__01.jpg
monowing
IMG_20200208_162934.jpg
monowing and additional body rear wing
IMG_20200208_163004.jpg
monowing and additional adjustable body rear wing
IMG_20200304_104634.jpg
out from the press
IMG_20200304_124120.jpg
dolphin wing almost ready
IMG_20200304_124859.jpg
dolphin wing and adjustable body rear wing
IMG_20200315_161702.jpg
new fuselage and rear wing in progress
IMG_20200324_161115.jpg
concave 3cm
These users thanked the author vol for the post:
Europ2 (Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:18 pm)
Rating: 3.03%

kiteykitekite
Frequent Poster
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:41 pm
Kiting since: 2020
Gear: Core kites
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby kiteykitekite » Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:12 pm

Europ2 wrote:
kiteykitekite wrote:
Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:32 am
5% Thickness :-) You be making most kite designers irate.
I think you have forgotten you are on the Hydrofoil forum so we are designing hydrofoil wings and not kite wings :D
Except when you see they design hydrofoils as they do kites, thick. I highly suspect given my post disappeared there is a closeted queer ideology enforcing this design facet. Their greatest fear to be outed.

plummet
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 6819
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:25 pm
Local Beach: EE
Favorite Beaches: NZ
Style: Terrain riding
Gear: Old wornout ozone.
Plummet hydrofoil and mutant
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 224 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby plummet » Wed Mar 25, 2020 8:18 am

vol wrote:
Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:23 pm
Europ2 wrote:
Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:32 pm
I wouldn't have thought that one could go as low as 5% ? Which fiber (Carbon or glass) and which filler have you used ?
n-10 ? What is exactly your airfoil section ? Is it the NACA 2410 thinned down from 10 to 5% ?
Would you have any pictures of the manufacturing process ?
because it is my 3rd wing, a little prehistory:
The first wing was monofoil, airfoil 2410, 10% thickness and very low AR approx 1000cm2, was really nice, pretty good control, nice rideable, but after few sessions I decided to rebuild it, I removed wing bottom and made it flat, surprisingly but wing performance was improved, was faster, less drag but the same good low speed, plus one unexpectable benefit, when the wing above the water sliding much easier and more control. Later I built additional fuselage with rear wing because mono for me was too much stabless, I like more dynamic riding and jumps.

The second wing, nothing special, hi ar, N-10 airfoil 8% approx 550cm2, 80%-20% glass-carbon, nice speed, stable in strong condition but low speed not good... For this wing also rebuilt boddy-rear-wing, added some layers of carbon because it was too flex.

The latest wing I build inspired dolphin fin, made it with plywood core and fiberglass because of chipper, used tons of glass :D 2x625 triaxial for one side, at the mast body 3x layers, the wing is very strong because I like jumps.
airfoil is N-10 5% http://airfoiltools.com/airfoil/details?airfoil=n10-il
At this moment I tested with previous rear wing-body, the new one rear wing is also N-10 5% but I can't try it because of carnitine...

Wings are built by press tech because I have lots of twintipe and wakeboards building experience.
The core is wood, for the first wing used paulownia, latest wings with a plywood core, all layers are collected and pressed for couple hours in 60 Celcius.
This process eliminates unwanted epoxy resin and providing the strongest and lightest construction, for example, the first wing version with extra body and rear wing was 800g only, the latest foil is twice heavier but is crazy durable, carbon can be less than 1kg
bohme wrote:
I like this :-)
Scaling an n-10 to 5% is not a bad choice.
The lower drag coefficient almost compensates for the bigger area.

My latest wing:
Front: 10% thickness, NACA2410, 710x145mm , ~800cm2
Rear: 10% thickness, NACA2410, 430x62mm , ~215cm2
(photo below)
It is so much easier than my old racefoils. Top speed is not much more than 22kn, but my VMG's are just as good as my racefoils.
Thanks!
Your wing looks nice :thumb:
I see you use aerodynamic calculations, but think, air is 784 times less dense than water! I don't know how many times forces are different but definitely are.

some pics from proccess

IMG_20200128_150545.jpgIMG_20200128_151345.jpgIMG_20200131_161557__01.jpgIMG_20200208_162934.jpgIMG_20200208_163004.jpgIMG_20200304_104634.jpgIMG_20200304_124120.jpgIMG_20200304_124859.jpgIMG_20200315_161702.jpgIMG_20200324_161115.jpg
NICE!
These users thanked the author plummet for the post:
vol (Sat Apr 04, 2020 6:59 pm)
Rating: 3.03%

grigorib
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 4163
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:12 pm
Kiting since: 2009
Local Beach: OBX; Clinton Lake, IL; Lake Michigan; Hood River; La Ventana; Ocean Park, PR; SPI; Tawas, MI
Gear: Kites: Slingshot Rally 5/7/9/11m, Turbine 9/13m, SST 4/5m, UFO 3/5/7/9m, Flysurfer Speed4 10m standard, Flysurfer 2cool 6m, Peter Lynn Venom II ARC 16m

Boards: Spleene RIP 37, Flysurfer Radical6 138, Flysurfer Flydoor5 XL, Slingshot/Moses/RDB 70/90/101cm masts with 1200/860/800/730/600 kitefoil or 2200/1700/1400 wingfoil wings and 310/230/425 stabilizers, Naish MicroChip 80cm, 36" Woody, Slingshot Dwarfcraft Micro 100, MBS Comp 95x

For sale: Slingshot Turbine 9/13m, 20” Guardian bar, 1700 sq.cm wing/fuselage/stabilizer fitting Moses mast
.
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 468 times
Been thanked: 696 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby grigorib » Wed Mar 25, 2020 8:43 pm

Speaking of surf/wave wing, say of 2000 sq.cm. which would you opt for - high aspect like a glider or low aspect somewhat shovel-shaped?

TomW
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 3585
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:43 pm
Kiting since: 2001
Local Beach: Vejbystrand, Lomma
Gear: TW Surfboards hydrofoil board 110
Gong Veloce M, 100cm carbon mast
Ozone Hyperlink V1 7m
Hyperlink V2 9m, 13m
Concept Air Wave 4,5m
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: Sweden
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 193 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby TomW » Wed Mar 25, 2020 9:29 pm

I suspect we'll be seeing some bigger wings coming out, 900-1200 cm2 with higher aspect and thinner profiles

User avatar
vol
Frequent Poster
Posts: 231
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 6:18 pm
Local Beach: Tarifa Spain
Favorite Beaches: Tarifa Spain, Prassonisi Rhodes, Brazil Taiba-Cumbucu-Paracuru
Style: hydrofoil, bigair, freestyle
Gear: Saul Custom Boards
Location: Tarifa Spain
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby vol » Wed Mar 25, 2020 10:14 pm

If you guys have some ideas I can built it, because I not using molds, for me is no problem to make different shape

lyznicek
Rare Poster
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:44 am
Kiting since: 2005
Local Beach: Goteborg area, SWE
lakes in the Czech Republic, Germany
Style: snowkite, hydrofoil
Gear: lei:Aeros Cruiser 13m2, Gaastra Spark 9m2, North Evo 7m2,
foilkite: Aeros Navy2 11m2, Gyro 7m2,
homemade hydrofoils
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Surf/wave wing thickness and NACA profiles

Postby lyznicek » Sat Apr 04, 2020 12:37 pm

Hey,
I am thiking about similar profile to naca2410 just a bit sharper in order to lower the drag for speed. The results from XFLR seems opposite... what do you think? Cheers
Attachments
polars.png
profile.png
profile.png (10.04 KiB) Viewed 804 times


Return to “Hydrofoil”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 427 guests