Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Warp Drive for the S683

A forum dedicated to Hydrofoil riders
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 2627
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:12 pm
Kiting since: 2009
Local Beach: OBX; Clinton Lake, IL; Lake Michigan; La Ventana; SPI; Hood River; Tawas, MI
Gear: Kites: Slingshot Rally 5/7/9/11m, Turbine 9m, SST 4/5/7m, UFO 9m, Flysurfer Speed4 10m standard, Peter Lynn Venom II ARC 16m

Boards: Spleene RIP 37, Flysurfer Radical6 138, Flysurfer Flydoor5 XL, Slingshot/Moses 80/82/91/101cm masts with 800/425 695/425 637/420 wingsets, 36" Woody, Slingshot Dwarfcraft Micro 3'6" 2019-2020, MBS Comp 95x

For sale: Moses 80cm alu mast $260
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 219 times
Been thanked: 326 times

Re: Warp Drive for the S683

Postby grigorib » Tue Nov 05, 2019 4:19 pm

alowishus wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 5:32 am
grigorib wrote:
Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:32 am
PurdyKiter wrote:
Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:14 pm
Going to try the 450 in a couple days. I have the 483, tried the 325 and that was kinda weird unstable.
450 will result in more front foot pressure. Overall the 483 is a better flying stabilizer while 450 is more prone to damage.

Same on my end - the small stabilizer felt “weird unstable”
Did you mean the 483 is more prone to damage?
Yes 483 is more prone to damage. I though of saying 450 is more damage-proof.

Correcting my original post. Thank you for catching the mistake

Return to “Hydrofoil”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests