A forum dedicated to Hydrofoil riders
-
grigorib
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 4163
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:12 pm
- Kiting since: 2009
- Local Beach: OBX; Clinton Lake, IL; Lake Michigan; Hood River; La Ventana; Ocean Park, PR; SPI; Tawas, MI
- Gear: Kites: Slingshot Rally 5/7/9/11m, Turbine 9/13m, SST 4/5m, UFO 3/5/7/9m, Flysurfer Speed4 10m standard, Flysurfer 2cool 6m, Peter Lynn Venom II ARC 16m
Boards: Spleene RIP 37, Flysurfer Radical6 138, Flysurfer Flydoor5 XL, Slingshot/Moses/RDB 70/90/101cm masts with 1200/860/800/730/600 kitefoil or 2200/1700/1400 wingfoil wings and 310/230/425 stabilizers, Naish MicroChip 80cm, 36" Woody, Slingshot Dwarfcraft Micro 100, MBS Comp 95x
For sale: Slingshot Turbine 9/13m, 20” Guardian bar, 1700 sq.cm wing/fuselage/stabilizer fitting Moses mast
.
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
468 times
-
Been thanked:
696 times
Postby grigorib » Tue Nov 05, 2019 4:19 pm
alowishus wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2019 5:32 am
grigorib wrote: ↑Mon Oct 28, 2019 2:32 am
PurdyKiter wrote: ↑Sun Oct 27, 2019 7:14 pm
Going to try the 450 in a couple days. I have the 483, tried the 325 and that was kinda weird unstable.
450 will result in more front foot pressure. Overall the 483 is a better flying stabilizer while 450 is more prone to damage.
Same on my end - the small stabilizer felt “weird unstable”
Did you mean the 483 is more prone to damage?
Yes 483 is more prone to damage. I though of saying 450 is more damage-proof.
Correcting my original post. Thank you for catching the mistake
Return to “Hydrofoil”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mede and 411 guests
