A forum dedicated to Hydrofoil riders
-
watercamper
- Rare Poster
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2020 12:57 am
- Kiting since: 2017
- Weight: 150
- Local Beach: Gorge, lower Columbia river, La ventana
- Style: TT, Surf, Foil
- Gear: Naish, SS, LF, OR, Mystic, Ion
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
5 times
-
Been thanked:
0
Postby watercamper » Sat Dec 26, 2020 10:35 pm
Which one? Intermediate foilers lkg for better equipment to progress on. Prefer playing in swell, chop n small waves vs going fast. She weighs 122 lvs. Me, 148 lbs. Will use them in the gorge, the Oregon coast maybe and La Ventana. Help us decide. Thanks!!
Last edited by
watercamper on Sun Dec 27, 2020 3:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
grigorib
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 2785
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:12 pm
- Kiting since: 2009
- Local Beach: OBX; Clinton Lake, IL; Lake Michigan; La Ventana; SPI; Hood River; Tawas, MI
- Gear: Kites: Slingshot Rally 5/7/9/11m, Turbine 9m, SST 4/5/7m, UFO 5/7/9m, Flysurfer Speed4 10m standard, Peter Lynn Venom II ARC 16m
Boards: Spleene RIP 37, Flysurfer Radical6 138, Flysurfer Flydoor5 XL, Slingshot/Moses 80/91/101cm masts with 800/425 695/425 637/420 1000/421 wingsets, 36" Woody, Slingshot Dwarfcraft Micro 3'6" 2019-2020, MBS Comp 95x
For sale: Moses 80cm alu mast $260
.
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
239 times
-
Been thanked:
348 times
Postby grigorib » Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:11 pm
For that weight - 150
-
tmcfarla
- Frequent Poster
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:35 am
-
Has thanked:
7 times
-
Been thanked:
34 times
Postby tmcfarla » Sun Dec 27, 2020 12:27 am
I’m your weight and have lots of time on 110 and recently got a 170 (just one session so far). I like the 170 and don’t feel it is too big, but if I were doing it over again, I’d probably get the 150 instead. You probably would be happy with either though. I have the 170 classic, I’ve heard the newer two piece ones ride a bit bigger but have never used one.
-
jumptheshark
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1588
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 6:36 pm
- Local Beach: Shhhhh
- Favorite Beaches: Nude
- Gear: The good stuff
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
262 times
-
Been thanked:
465 times
Postby jumptheshark » Sun Dec 27, 2020 3:29 pm
watercamper wrote: ↑Sat Dec 26, 2020 10:35 pm
Which one? Intermediate foilers lkg for better equipment to progress on. Prefer playing in swell, chop n small waves vs going fast. She weighs 122 lvs. Me, 148 lbs. Will use them in the gorge, the Oregon coast maybe and La Ventana. Help us decide. Thanks!!
You are both light, but if you truly want to ride the swell more than power up the kite, the 170 is money. The Classic is a thinner wing profile and lower drag than the surf version that has interchangeable rear stabilizers.
I am ~170 lbs and find the 170 classic hits the sweet spot for me. I want to feel every bit of swell and after moving up gradually with wing sizes find I really need that much area to comfortably slow down and ride swell independently of kite power. At the top end its still plenty fast and never feels too big. I like to shut the kite right off at times, but generally use kite power fluidly throughout my riding. This foil has paired exceptionally well with Peak4 kites and suits strutless and single strut kites where you typically ride a relatively small kite compared to even other foilers.
-
geokite
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:40 am
- Local Beach: Silver Strand, Mission Bay
- Favorite Beaches: Sherman, Belmont
- Style: Surf, Foil
- Gear: Firewire, SS, Lift, Gin, Kitech, Switch
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
50 times
-
Been thanked:
20 times
Postby geokite » Mon Dec 28, 2020 6:40 am
If you fly to la ventanna, consider the travel size of the classics. The 150 surf might be a good compromise between the two, and better packability.
Return to “Hydrofoil”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: mfeche and 14 guests