And what is ýour reasoning for wanting this?
Peter
I used to ride 2 setups: 679 with 330/483 or 438 I think. I always had to switch the stab when we had very low wind (below 10 kts) or higher winds >10kts. The 679 is unpumpable for me with a small stab. I can pump the T1 or go nearly the same speed as with the 679/330 combo. So first thing is definitely space. The 633 makes no big difference for me compared to 679 with big Stab in terms of light wind. When I talk about new things, I think about the different options when free styling. You can do different combos with the foil under and over the water. Surfing on the water and standard foiling gives new freedom when it comes to free styling.leeuwen wrote: ↑Tue Jul 19, 2022 4:57 amCan you quantify why it is easier and what kind of new things you are learning?
I only had a 10 minute session on a t1 but I would expect the opposite to be true:
I found it very maneuverable BUT I would argue the slower the board reacts to input the better for learning new things.
In general while learning I never think: I am limited because my foil moves to slowly to my input.
At the same time having less, especially, pitch stability makes a lot of things harder to do.
Compared to my 679 the T1 also seemed to need a little bit more power. Slow speed stability / stalling felt less predictable then my 679 setup. I am sure there is some getting used to part of that but it certainly wasn’t obviously better for me at these things.
Of course the T1 is a lot more maneuverable.
I am sure there is a market for that and some other benefits (and drawbacks) but I don’t think it’s a product that will replace the majority of the current foils. I think for that it would need more stability to cater to a wider range of riders and/or a very significant pricing advantage.
I currently see it as something that adds to the spectrum of possibilities just like a race setup. Some will like it but it is not something that’s going to be mainstream in its current form.
Some are out there. Same wing I understand, different branding. Never tried it:
Another monofoil is the Spleene. According to this test, it works best when ridden fast and requires a high skill level.br44 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:28 amSome are out there. Same wing I understand, different branding. Never tried it:
https://deltahydrofoil.com/products/1500-reflex
https://kiteboarding.com/proddetail.asp ... ngs&cat=27
Just an FYI that these links are to FONT WINGS with a modest amount of convex (the north) and reflex (on the delta). One has one and the other the other. Neither has both and not to the comparatively extreme levels of the T1. There are no “copies” of the T1 which is patent pending in the US. Hope this helps re clarification. There is a lot of engineering in the T1 beyond reflex and convex that we are proud of and owes a great deal to Goetz Bramsfeld, Associate Professor of Aeronautics engineering at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada to give credit where credit is due! Rudy @TritonFoils.br44 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 1:28 amSome are out there. Same wing I understand, different branding. Never tried it:
https://deltahydrofoil.com/products/1500-reflex
https://kiteboarding.com/proddetail.asp ... ngs&cat=27
I feels to me like there are already like a zillion freeride wings for low-powered foiling and wingfoiling on the market but not enough products really dedicated for big air kitefoiling. That is why I would like to see a monofoil that´s light, very stable at high speeds and that can also take a beating, dedicated to high powered big air kitefoiling.TritonFoils wrote: ↑Wed Jul 20, 2022 2:44 pmWe are also curious as to what kite foilers would like in terms of new monofoil wing performance specs.
I wouldn´t care about less pitch control at lower speeds at all. All what matters is that it stays stable at high speed.TritonFoils wrote: Do riders want a faster wing? This could be an option with the possibility of losing some pitch control at lower speeds vs. the current model.
Users browsing this forum: francis luengo and 265 guests