Adventure Logs wrote:Have you had much time or any under a Soul?
I did say this before but no, I have never flown it. It looks like an excellent kite and I have a deep respect for Flysurfer's design and use of materials. I have little doubt it is probably one of the best kites currently available, but not on price. If I was to like past to get it for a deep discount sure it is good
Adventure Logs wrote:
I love my 6m with a HF, it drifts almost as well as my Peak4 3m
That is nice. For active type of drift where the kite has line tension you can always oversheet a kite to make it better. The Peak 4 is another kite I should try, though it doesn't exactly suit me. I have been told it doesn't handle slack lines well but I could make it work with previous generations. The low L/D is a concern because I like to jump and previous peaks didn't really go upwind on a surfboard.
Adventure Logs wrote:
The Sonic 2 you can wave ride some, the easy backstall helps but it's not really designed for that
All foil kites generally can be made to backstall easy, it's a fact from having to reverse fly for relaunch. Tubes move away from this because they don't need it. If you put something like a malabar on a foil kite it becomes more like a tube and the jackomixer is something a bit more foil. The Sonic 2 is high AR so it is easier to oversheet a kite like this especially if like me and most experienced foil kiters would have it setup for this. It is because of the short trim range for high AR, but also because you can use smaller sizes of them than other kites because of the performance. Most small foil kites are similar to this as well.
Adventure Logs wrote:
Also no foil(including the Peak4) will work that great when you rapidly ride into the kite but they are designed to drift(slack line) much better now than back in the Speed days.
The Psycho 4 does
Arcs were excellent at it too but a bit heavy. This ability is better the bigger the foil kite, so with speeds on the 21m or even the 18 and 19m it was excellent. I would not be surprised that a higher AR 21m would be fine at it. I may one day get one just to try. After riding smaller ones I found the performance addictive and as you found you could wave ride them. I can even make them slack line, but they had to be religiously placed overhead.
Adventure Logs wrote:
I enjoy hydrofoiling because it's less impact on my body
Most definitely me too especially as I get older. Most won't be aware of the subconcussive trauma you experience kiting, especially as the wind/chop gets strong. A large percentage of people will experience the long term delirious effects of this. I know I likely have the genes for it and the low grade head aches and associated memory loss i get are disconcerting. But you have to live life don't you! There is potential treatments but they are a while away, I should probably start taking supplements to reduce it.
Adventure Logs wrote:
Say you have a LEI kiteboarder who has been thinking about switching over to foilkites. After hearing that "Pansh is just as good as xxx brand" but for much cheaper and ends up buying one. Right now of the bag he has big problems(which you are more likely than not going to have). The kiteboarder has no experience with foils, doesn't know how to tune or want to put the time and patience in to try to tune it correctly. He/she ends up having a horrible experience with it and then from the moment on believes that all foil kites are crap and inferior and shares is opinions with his fellow kiters. That's the type of scenario where I have problems.
Most definitely I 100% agree, and I have seen this happen many times with Pansh kites and from people that like foil kites too. I have also seen this happen regularly to people from tubes who buy second hand foils kites of the major brands. I have seen foil kites second hand that are in such a condition as to be described as the worst kite you could ever possibly fly. That isn't to say they can't be fixed up, because they can and I have many many a time. But I have met many people who bought these then given foils a miss or have owned a foil kite and then given up on frustration to why it won't work right after a year or 2. I have been there myself, but I worked it out in the end. It's why I try to explain things here, admittedly poorly at times.
So as well it is admirable that you have this concern, but freedom really is the best way. People need to be allowed choices and to have choices. I don't see you posting about x,y or z china kite company do I ? Why is it? Why post about just Pansh and not the many other china kite brands out there? Yes I know I post about Pansh but so too do other people. We post good things and then also sometimes some bad things about them. There is people like me that like their kites. Case in point Jacko, he bought a heap of them and likes them, he came from tube kites if I remember right. No experience with foil kites at all and then just completely reinvents the mixer! If Pansh was really horrible people would not continue to buy them, post nice things about them or spend time improving them. Pansh as well would not continue to release new models or improve existing ones. Though I have found them hard to communicate with they do if you try and they obviously listen to some people a lot.
I will reiterate allow people the freedom. Freedom of speech is great you can post what you want and so can I. This is not something I like China for, but I know the Chinese people and businesses like Pansh are not to blame for this, but a very stupid European ideology that took hold there and still threatens western freedoms every day. I actually get teary thinking of the amount of suffering and hardship it has taken to get those freedoms. People really are oblivious to the horror that awaits them as the 1st and 2nd amendment are slowly withered away, that is if they ever really existed in the first place.
Adventure Logs wrote:
So now you think adjustable mixers are stupid? What?
No... We need nuance in these conversations. I said an argument could be made that they are stupid. I didn't even make the argument, it was on
http://surfforum.oase.com/. I have to say though it has sort of been floating in my mind a bit. The reason is like with Pansh having no adjustment can be fine and I know the reason for this given how things shrink. The second problem is people don't know how to do the adjustments right. The third is the adjustments like Flysurfer gives are not right or the best. The forth is it is actually not hard to add in adjustments. I lean more towards having adjustments, just if they were done right. I have discussed this with Armin, though the conversation has I guess ended. One idea he had was quite good and would allow the adjustments to be not detrimental in a way that thicker lines are needed. I added a bit to it, but I must say this is not rocket science and innovation really works well in collaboration. It is sad the culture we have has everyone so on guard about what they are doing. You don't have to have faith in the person you discuss with just take the argument on it's own. Don't make logic errors as you won't survive the internet well otherwise. And no that is not at all directed at Armin, though some could be.
Adventure Logs wrote:
Well I think I've exhausted my opinion on this matter to death so I shall leave this thread. There will always be things to argue about but it's a waste in my opinion to argue with a brick wall. You enjoy having to constantly work on your Panshs to get them to fly correctly(I know you enjoy this anyhow) while I'll continue to enjoy my Flysurfers while abusing them, putting them away wet and sandy, kitelooping them, drifting them, taking them out greatly overpowered, still relaunching them after sitting on the water for extended periods of time, being able to put a huge amount of hours on them while easily bringing them back to near factory performance, having great customer service not only from my dealer but from FS headquarters and main designers, and overall having fantastic worry free sessions, day after day
For certain Flysurfer are good kites and brand. I would like them to change a bit and so too the whole industry, but who am I ? One of the "fucktards" I guess. I do know Armin is working on some things and I will be excited to see them.
jakemoore wrote:
It seems to me that if anything, every single kiteboarder I know would like to spend a little less on kiteboarding yet still keep the stoke alive. Its cool to try and save money!
Every single one has bought used gear and is repairing gear from time to time. Plenty of people are flying brands that have a lower cost and budget image and reputation because they can't give a damn if people think they spend high $$$ on the gear.
Original Best model, Switch and others are all marketed as budget brands and we see the kites on the beach. People aren't ashamed to fly budget.
And so many people including myself drive an old beater car to the beach because we don't want to rust out a nicer and more expensive car.
Finally, kiteboarder love to be photographed and take photo and video or compete online in jumps through Woo. Probably 25% have a GoPro or a Woo? And photographers and drone pilots love to photograph kiteboarding because it is a photogenic sport. I thought the shadow-jumping snow kite video was cool and respect for jumping pretty high on packed ground.
Well interesting point. Most kiters are not into the whole photo thing but are happy when it happens. I get plenty of photos taken of me
people have apparently taken to video too the way they hold their phones tracking me.. get to work social network people...
I do however mainly ride Flysurfer, I only have a few Pansh kites.
Flysurfer have without a doubt been an extremely low cost high value kite to me. You can put an insane amount of hours on them and they last almost forever. They are quite customizable and designs as advertised were way ahead of their time. The Psycho 4 concept is still yet to really hit the market well, trust me it will, probably after we get over chickenloops though. Kite designer aren't a high IQ group. I mean why would a high IQ individual do it when they can get much more money else where? You would have to be passionate about it. And if we look at some of the best designers like Armin or Greg (BRM) etc we see some very passionate people who after so many years are absolutely in love with the sport. I am glad we have people like that or I wouldn't have as nice gear...
Adventure Logs wrote:
I find it hilarious that you complain about the slow turning speed while defending Pansh even though our main Pansh whore(foilholio) has claimed many times that the Pansh is also slow but that doesn’t matter to him. So what is it? Again have you even ridden one?
Well they are certainly not slow with a jackomixer, very simple to do too. You are correct I am a whore and I don't care for turning, well it can be nice. The 18m A15 with Jacko mixer is much faster turning but by no means a lightning kite. Matteo would likely hate it because it is also slow flying, Matrixx 2 like I think.
Adventure Logs wrote:
I think a signifícate amount of credit should go to the Soul. It really has made the connection from LEI to Foilkite.
For certain but there is a lot of foil kites past and present that are very valid. Some of the more interesting current designs to me are Peak4, Firefly, Hyperlink, Wave, Pulsion and of course Soul. I am not sure one foil kite can do everything but from the Psycho 4 I have a kite that nearly does. I had to laugh all those years to tube wave kites that couldn't jump well... Psycho 4 jumped awesome.
Trent hink wrote:
The pansh kites are made of nylon. I have one. Nylon, even with a good waterproof coating has some problems when it gets wet.
Yes but nylon is stronger than polyester. The light weight fabrics for ultra light foilkites and paragliders is nylon as far as I am aware...
https://www.extremtextil.de/en/ripstop- ... g-sqm.html
https://www.extremtextil.de/en/ripstop- ... g-sqm.html
https://nemoadventureanywhere.blogspot. ... on-vs.html
Strength
It’s not a fair comparison to say that Sugar Ray Robinson, a welterweight (140-147 lbs) is less strong than Evander Holyfield (heavyweight at >200 lbs). In same way, we generally try to compare fabrics ‘pound for pound’ – meaning that they are at the same denier (fineness of fiber). At the same denier, nylon tends to be a stronger than polyester and the difference can be such that a 420D nylon is stronger than 600D polyester. The strength difference shows up when you’re examining tear, abrasion resistance, or something as simple as the fabric’s ability to hold stitches. Since polyester is weaker than nylon, the thread count (and thus weight) can often be higher in polyester at the same denier.
but
The Cruel Sun
Seems pretty clear cut right? Nylon is stronger… except that in the presence of UV, it will break down and start to degrade much faster than polyester. Polyester naturally inhibits UV. Although the fiber may be weaker at the start, it holds up better over time.
One reason ultra light don't last as long. The other being a lower strength starting point from lighter fabric.
I would like to thank everyone for their comments so far, while things can go off topic and get "heated", there is some valuable exchange happening here. I should probably try some of the latest kites, if just to stay in the loop.