Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Beaver Tail Alternatives

Forum for hydrofoil builders.


lightandfrost
Rare Poster
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 1:48 am
Kiting since: 0
Local Beach: e
Favorite Beaches: e
Style: onshore waveriding
Gear: v
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Beaver Tail Alternatives

Postby lightandfrost » Tue Jan 01, 2019 2:52 am

Light and Frost(L&f) has been studying and testing the addition of a beaver tail to the hydrofoil fuselage. It was decided to add the beaver tail as a fuselage extension with a zero(0) angle of attack rather then replace the stabilizer with a beaver tail.

These board/mast/hydrofoil mixes without beaver tail fuselage extensions have been used extensively for eight(8) months so the operating characteristics without a beaver tail were well understood. Readers should keep in mind that L&f is only interested in developing hydrofoils that are resistant to stall when operating short 70cm masts is rough water, heavy chop, and onshore wave riding. L&f has no interest in riding flat water, racing, or using longer masts to dampen the wave/chop problem when operating hydrofoils close to the water-atmosphere interface.
The tests were conducted using a 13 meter ram-air kite in a cross to cross onshore wind of various strengths in one(1) to two(2) foot seas. Wave riding tests will have to wait for the period mid May thru September.
Both boards seen here have different mast-wing-stabilizer-fuselage sets but the results were identical.

The following was found.

Board pumping to keep the foil functioning was inhanced.

Board stability was increased in several areas as follows:

1. Loss of stabilizer control was reduced in chop and wave. The beaver tail appears to dampen the onset of stabilizer control failure. The usual plop sound which occurs with the onset of stabilizer control loss was many times reduced to a whisper which was easily recovered by lowering the nose. The onset of this stall was more easily recognized, less abrupt and thus corrected earlier.

2. General fore and aft pitch in one(1) to two(2) foot seas was smoothed easing nap-of-wave control input.

3. During the circular arc of a gybe, control and stability was enhanced. Subjectively the beaver tail appeared to produce a smoother and more coordinated turning maneuver when both on and off the foil. The entire 180 deg turning arc of the gybe was conducted without changing foot position. The board was then ridden toe-heel side and once speed was attained the feet were repositioned.

4. The kite could be parked overhead and the board pumped allowing dead downwind riding with little power input from the kite. When turning downwind and thus losing kite thrust, the loss of hydrofoil lift was delayed.

No negative effects were seen.
Attachments
Beaver Tail 0365.jpg
Beaver Tail 0360.jpg
Beaver Tail 0359.jpg

User avatar
NYKiter
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 1810
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:17 pm
Kiting since: 2010
Style: Wave
Gear: .
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Beaver Tail Alternatives

Postby NYKiter » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:23 pm

Can you run any CFD simulations on and compare Reynolds number with vs. without?
Might give you actual data rather than anecdotal?

Ive been wondering about biplane wings....small one up top of the mast to give more lift when going slow, then when it rises your on a faster wing.....who knows, keep going!

slowboat
Frequent Poster
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:55 pm
Kiting since: 2000
Style: wave foiling
Gear: This and that
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 0

Re: Beaver Tail Alternatives

Postby slowboat » Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:30 pm

Can you show pictures of your “control” hydrofoil? How do we know how well it performs?


Return to “Hydrofoil Builders”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: tegirinenashi and 3 guests

cron