This is your problem Starsky, you read shit with 0 facts and you explode onto the scene like you got me.jumptheshark wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2019 2:32 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... vel-claims
This is your problem Starsky, you read shit with 0 facts and you explode onto the scene like you got me.jumptheshark wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2019 2:32 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... vel-claims
At least I haven't made such an ass of myself that would require a name change. The science of sea level drop in equatorial regions since 1600's is solid. The acceleration of sea level rise since 1990 is also true but is short term and coincided with arctic low in 2012. Things are going the other way again. Your article is pure ad hominem attack, no facts attached garbage by a climate journo, whatever that is.jumptheshark wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2019 6:35 pm
You either know that the article you posted is flimsy old shit, or you choose to put stock in it.
By the coal stove and wood fire place with a riffle handy to fend off wolfs and climate cultists from taking your meat. That's going to be you in Ontario. I'll be down south like a civilized human being.
So how many times have we passed this "point of no return", or "the climate tipping point" or the end of the world as we know it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests