So two wrongs makes one right then? I mean considering your style of posting would never include any ad hominem attacks yourself? Or is this some crusade defending the honour of someone that would never read any posts on this board? And that makes it acceptable to reply to Strekke in such a manner?marlboroughman wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 2:32 pmZero tolerance for ad hominem attacks. You bring shit like this, you better have something. I am waiting, and don't forget your sources.Havre wrote: ↑Tue Jan 07, 2020 9:36 am
What kind of way of communication is this?
Foilholio presents data. Strekke makes his/hers assessment of the sources. You might agree/disagree with that assessment, but at least he/she isn't a complete !%"%!" writing the reply to foilholio.
What if Strekke now is to reply to you in the same manner? How long do you think it takes before it becomes purely an exchange of insults between the two of you?
Not sure what sources you are looking for. Sources that your style of communication is rather poor if you want to have a fruitful discussion?
All rhetorical of course. I didn't want Strekke to spend energy replying to these kind of posts and I don't want this thread to become a discussion about my views on your posting style.