Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Fuel 04 17 and Rhino 4 12 by Hangtimer

Find reviews of kites, boards and accessories
User avatar
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 41011
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 1:00 am
Kiting since: 2000
Weight: 98 kg
Local Beach: Cumbuco, Brazil
Barra do Cauipe, Brazil
Favorite Beaches: same
Style: Airstyle
Gear: Rebel 2015 18
Brand Affiliation: None.
Location: World (KF Admin)
Has thanked: 320 times
Been thanked: 621 times

Fuel 04 17 and Rhino 4 12 by Hangtimer

Postby Toby » Tue Dec 23, 2003 3:14 pm

Hi there !

Been away for just one week in Shark Bay, conditions being 14-16 kts, first time experience on Fuel 17 04 and Rhino 04 12. Coming from Fuel 03, I just want to summarize my main impressions here, not providing a full scope review !

Starting with the Scepter Bar, I experienced the black nipple supposed to fix the chicken loop within the hook to be too short (DaKine Fusion). Lost my kite once, then fixed the problem by taping my hook. Fortunately kite wasn´t damaged, nevertheless I lost it on the beach whilest checking the trim .. What I really miss on the bar are leader lines. Benchmark IMHO still is Takoon with its "integrated" leaders. First I didn´t know if I´d get used to the micro hook, but after changing bar with my girl friend after two days, I immediatley missed it ! So it works really well .. I´d like to note that the depower strap works without any complains, me coming from the clamcleat not yet being decided if not prefering the cleaner cleat solution. Several times I had to search for the right strap to tear, nevertheless marked up black/red. Maybe ust a question of getting used to ..

Fuel 17 04: To be honest, I was quite sceptical about the one-pump. Practise waived all my concerns. To say it all clear: it´s a HUGE difference just pumping one valve on the Fuel rather than pumping/closing all valves on the Rhino. Slingshot added a ball stopper even on the one remaining in-valve, so nothing of convienance can be added there ! Deflating the kite was easier than expected - I rolled the kite from both tips to center strut. In the air the kite has remained the same apart from the lower edge of the window, where the 03 one was significantly unstable in lower winds, 04 model now being very stable and providing power more constantly during sining. The kite has not become quicker to turn and I wonder how the 19 behaves with regards to some statements read, noting same speed as Fuel 17 03. Hang has improved slightly/incremental on the way down.

North Rhino 04: Quality, starting right from the nicely cut and designed bag, is absolute benchmark ! It´s not only looking good (Slingshot, who the hell advised these neon-stripes ?? had a kite with egg-yellow canopee mixed up with neon-yellow stripes on the struts - that uggly compared to my 03´s !!) every single detail is well thought through and immediately paints a smile in your face. I was a bit concerned about the easy fitting valve plugs, but they held the high pressure, even over days ! As stated above, one pump might be a nice feature here as well, the deflating process on the back of the black sticks necessary to make the valves deflate being quite inconveniant. As I found ball stoppers in cabrinhas properly working, I wonder why to chose this complicated way .. In the air I found a nicely balanced kite, definitely not providing the low end and constant pull if my previous Fuel 13 03. Especially in waves I´ve to "upgrade" to a 14 for similar low end. Talking to several North minded riders there, bottom line was that Rhino 04s increase in speed can´t make up for it´s loss in profile depth (Rhino 2), grunt being significantly lower effectively. I´m convinced statements will vary a lot depending on the conditions found. In transitions, Rhino provides power more constantly than Fuel, where timing is absolutely crucial, to receive necessary pull after kite passing 1h. I had expected softer landings with Rhino 4. That´s what I had always been jalous watching my fellows on Rhino 2. Maybe it´s due to my Fuel-influenced technique, hope to further improve here ..

With regards to the overall conditions I found in Sal, I missed my good old Fuel 13, which provided exactly the right turning speed and pull I need in waves and which made my summer vacation in Mauritius such a great success. I´m happy that I haven´t yet bought a full quiver - due to suppliers delay - as I learnt that it´s more the overall character of a kite that has to fit one´s style and prefered conditions, rather than a single benefits. Will continue testing ..



Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Postby Guest » Mon Mar 29, 2004 10:31 pm

I don't completely agree with Hangtimer.

I've had every kite model that Slingshot has made (except the GTO's) including the B series and the Stealth (sucked) including the 2003 Fuel 17m2.
I truely feel that the 2004 kites (at least the 13M2 and the 17m2 - the 2004 kites that I've flown) are significantly faster turning than the 2003 models. This is in addition to the other refinements including being more stable.

One Pump is a gimmick - BUT one that I'd like to see continue - as it makes pumping a kite faster especially in the cold winter weather - I love it!!

I only have one problem with the entire set-up - the wrist leash.
I've always modified my set-up for a front line leash and spreader leash attachment. NOW if they realy come out with the Surefire Spreader Bar....

Return to “Reviews”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests