Contact   Imprint   Advertising   Guidelines

Is a Spitfire safer?

A forum dedicated to Hydrofoil riders
slowboat
Frequent Poster
Posts: 226
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:55 pm
Kiting since: 2000
Style: wave foiling
Gear: This and that
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby slowboat » Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:00 am

Zeeko claims the Spitifire foil is safer in crashes as it is less likely to come after you. Also, it is more tolerant of breaches so one is less likely to crash. Can anyone with real world experiences comment on this? Thanks

bigtone667
Frequent Poster
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 7:24 am
Kiting since: 2013
Local Beach: Birdie Beach, Budgewoi Beach, Lakes Beach
Favorite Beaches: Umina Beach, Birdies Beach, Lake Munmorah, Canton, The Swamp, Le Morne
Style: surf, foiling, jumping, lawn mowing
Gear: BRM Cloud D's, Duotone Rebels

North Surfboards, BRM Paipo, Shinn Jackson, Firewire Evo, CrazyFly Doors, Naish Hover 155/130, Naish Thrust Surf XL Foil, Zeeko XXLW Spitfire, Fanatic Aero 1500
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby bigtone667 » Thu Jan 18, 2018 1:12 am

slowboat wrote:
Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:00 am
Zeeko claims the Spitifire foil is safer in crashes as it is less likely to come after you. Also, it is more tolerant of breaches so one is less likely to crash. Can anyone with real world experiences comment on this? Thanks
I would generally agree with the first statement, and strongly agree with the second statement.

3InletsWindsports
Frequent Poster
Posts: 362
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:52 am
Kiting since: 2001
Local Beach: Shallow Inlet, Corner Inlet, Andersons inlet.
Favorite Beaches: Shallow Inlet, Point Danger.
Style: freeride
Gear: Zeeko
Brand Affiliation: Zeeko importer in Australia
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby 3InletsWindsports » Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:05 pm

I use two straps and have found I’ve tended towards not detaching from board in crashes. So I’m ready for quick restart. This is due to the softer way the Spitfire crashes IMHO.
Also on many breaches the Spitfire has recovered lift before board touchdown so you keep going.

Plus all my shin scars are from contact with the rear wing of Std. Foils so since being a Spitfire pilot no new scars.

GJibb
Rare Poster
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 7:13 pm
Kiting since: 1
Gear: kites and boards
Brand Affiliation: None
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby GJibb » Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:17 am

*NOT from experience*
The Spitfire is less likely to shoot away during a crash like a traditional hydrofoil do to both of its wings having lift, where a typical hydrofoils front wing lifts while the back wings for is downward.
I've certainly noticed with my Zeeko Blue and White that it is happy to shoot away (quite far on occasion) during falls, where the Spitfire stays closer to the rider for retrieval.

borist
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 531
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 12:30 am
Kiting since: 0
Brand Affiliation: None
Location: San Diego, CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby borist » Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:50 am

slowboat wrote:
Thu Jan 18, 2018 12:00 am
Zeeko claims the Spitifire foil is safer in crashes as it is less likely to come after you. Also, it is more tolerant of breaches so one is less likely to crash. Can anyone with real world experiences comment on this? Thanks
Spitfire indeed tends not to follow after a dismount/crash.
The second part is bit more murky. With XLW wings I'd say yes, it often sort of "burps" if you exceed the limits (too close to surface or small breach or too slow) yet it continues without stalling completely.
With standard wings it gets trickier because they are rather quick reacting so the tolerance to breach is rather narrow and very dependent on rider's skills

User avatar
bragnouff
Very Frequent Poster
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:00 am
Kiting since: 99
Local Beach: New Brighton
Gear: Alkita boards
Zeeko foil
GK Trix
Enduro9
Brand Affiliation: GK enthusiast
Location: Te Wai Pounamu
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby bragnouff » Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:34 am

borist wrote:
Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:50 am
With XLW wings I'd say yes, it often sort of "burps" if you exceed the limits (too close to surface or small breach or too slow) yet it continues without stalling completely.
(...)
That's quite handy indeed, an audible warning to not raise any further. Most of the time, there's margin for corrective action after the burp.
In terms of safety, at least for the XLW wing set is that they have blunt tips, thick profiles, and quite a short wingspan so you'd have to be very unlucky to get a cut from these whenever you bang your legs around the wings.

Jzh_perth
Frequent Poster
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:51 pm
Kiting since: 2009
Local Beach: Scarborough, wa
Style: Hydrofoil, Sufboard and TT
Gear: Flysurfer
Brand Affiliation: Flysurfer dealer
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby Jzh_perth » Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:51 pm

For me it was negligible. I bought the spitfire in a December 2016 - not long after launch- and rode it 12 months.

Had 2 years foiling experience prior.

I’ve never had a foil chase me down in a crash so can’t comment.

Spitfire is more tolerant of front wing breaches.

At the end of the day it was a fun foil but I could t say it’s safer than regular design. I don’t think foiling is particularly dangerous in itself. Any foil in breaking waves and whitewater is an nightmare. I prefer to ride My Zeeko Green and white.

User avatar
flying grandpa
Medium Poster
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:02 am
Kiting since: 2005
Local Beach: Siemiany, Rewa
Favorite Beaches: Stegna, Orle, Karwia
Style: hydrofoil long distance, slalom, waves
Gear: ZEEKO, Soul, Sonic.
Brand Affiliation: NONE
Location: Poland
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: Is a Spitfire safer?

Postby flying grandpa » Tue Jan 23, 2018 8:27 pm

As Spitfire is alu foil, it tends to sink faster then carbon foils due to its weight = safer as its foils stick less from water surface and for shorter periods during crashes.

But in shore-brake the weight has negative value, as it happens to me few days ago - the foil hit my helmet when I lost control in shore-brake crossing.


Return to “Hydrofoil”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: tkaraszewski and 4 guests

cron