That's what I mentioned on earlier post about water level. My copy of Tone's FB-picture-post was later and sure it is best guess as I did my guess. Lower tide would mean lift-off point could be closer. But erosion/wave breaker fences on landing site do no lie unless fences were moved after satellite visit to take picture..JakeFarley wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:35 pmIt's a great jump but 200m - I don't think so. Media sensationalism. The aerial photo by joriws appears to be taken at a lower tide than when he jumped in the video. That would make it look longer. I agree with Toby - 100m.
Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 57 guests