May be 2 negative rocker areas then, one at the front and one at the back? To even out the maximum lift distribution. Just a thought. A bit like foil with 2 wings?
Any chance you could give some insight or a primer of what to expect as far as the relationship of Savitsky theory's and flat planing hulls engaged at an angle (edged) with relatively continuous rocker and variable pitch (weight forward/aft dynamic) capabilities?
In 2 places it might work but I am not sure about how much drag will be there, especially at low speeds.sergei Scotland wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 4:20 pmMay be 2 negative rocker areas then, one at the front and one at the back? To even out the maximum lift distribution. Just a thought. A bit like foil with 2 wings?
8 knots riding?
No chanceMatteo V wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2019 7:15 pmAny chance you could give some insight or a primer of what to expect as far as the relationship of Savitsky theory's and flat planing hulls engaged at an angle (edged) with relatively continuous rocker and variable pitch (weight forward/aft dynamic) capabilities?
So.. under fairly steady state conditions, while under kite power, and edging on a typical reach/tack, the waterline under the board looks like the photo below.
Users browsing this forum: basti52406, Bing [Bot], bittersvolcom, Brent NKB, bshmng, cglazier, Da Yoda, jjm, lander, lightwind, Manxman, Pitu, thatwildtype, Tiiga, Trent hink, Vivo3d, Xtream, Yahoo [Bot] and 704 guests