Had a blast these days on the 3 m in waves, but on my foil it already started to feel to big in 25 knts.
Already had a short discussion with FS about a smaller size, but now I am sure it is worth a try.
Who else?
Yes thanks! Interesting how well the high AR single skin goes upwind. Would be good to try on the water.tomtom wrote:thanks for info!khaakon wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2019 2:04 pmOh, and not everybody would know, so here it is - there's a higher aspect singleskin from Born Kites, more racey I guess;
http://www.born-kite.de/?cat=c102_Race- ... lus--.html
Thread about it on PKF;
http://www.powerkiteforum.com/viewthread.php?tid=33919
Youtube footage;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 0FZWcrpyu4
This kite is not meant for kitesurfing at all, I am sorry I don't mean to hijack the thread, just that not many ppl know about Steffen Born and his ingenious strives in singleskin kitedesign.
I don't know about that. The reason a single remains open is because of trapped air. Not in the exact same sense as a double skin, but some air does have to be stuck their to keep it open. Double skins and LEI have to trap air also in a similar way too. I think it is because they have more rigid structure they can release more of that air by going lower AoA and so go faster and better upwind. There is also the fact that that a lack of rigidity causes flapping and so drag.tomtom wrote: With closer cell there is clear explanation with momentum of trapped air inside of kite /can be several KG on bigger sizes/ But peak has no trapped air, or at least no more than LEI.
It certainly sounds like a good theory. Mine would be that because in higher wind speeds you can generate more lift and so force from a lower AoA then the smaller sizes have been tuned to have a lower minimum AoA. You could easily check that by measuring. Your theory does sound good though. Otherwise like all smaller kites they just turn quick because of less drag from a thinner profile and less distance in the turn from a shorter wing span.tomtom wrote: So i think bigger size just doesnt have enough rigidity to act against in turns. Because rigidity of peaks is purely from wing load. /kg to m2/ Smaller size are proportionaly more loaded so much stiffer. You can clearly see it - 3 and 4 are almost solid in air while 5 is more "soft"
Also tip cells /main difference to v3/ probably arent able to support longer tips on bigger sizes in same manner than on smaller.
But all this is just theory to explain this phenomena of big vs small peaks. I dont know for sure
#Meetoo at 86 kg naked at 30knts 3m is for sure too big. Welcome in all weather foiling . Its not so that 3m is not depowerable. Its about going downwind rest pull in my case. Smaller the kite the less rest pull the more kiteless im. So there are definitely times where 3m is too big. 2.5 it is then? But different color please - i already have problem with 3 and 4Horst Sergio wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:17 pmHad a blast these days on the 3 m in waves, but on my foil it already started to feel to big in 25 knts.
Already had a short discussion with FS about a smaller size, but now I am sure it is worth a try.
Who else?
Horst Sergio wrote: ↑Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:17 pmHad a blast these days on the 3 m in waves, but on my foil it already started to feel to big in 25 knts.
Already had a short discussion with FS about a smaller size, but now I am sure it is worth a try.
Who else?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 333 guests