climate change / unpredictable weather/wind

[foilholio]

The BBC is clearly a pseudoscience site.

[Matteo V]

the one obviously taking most of the sh*t being Slide

I thought he was the one posting the most.
Anyway it is not considered rude to abuse nice people who care about the planet and its many peoples or is he a kicking post when you've had a bad day ,but I really don't care ,I understand its not a subject people want to confront, which does surprize me this attitude from family people , but thx for your participation -now rip that apart , and only quote the bits where you might get you a laugh

when all the time the Australia burns and high winds today again , and big fires expecting to grow and join up with other big fires , where and when will it end
just ask any Australian, is this a product of climate change , 3months of summer yet to go after 3years of drought and very dry conditions and this is just a taster of whats to come in our future world

but as I say , abuse away if that's your thing , I am here to point out the damage we have done and still doing and I will not go away -you mother fuckers are going to listen , because this is more important than me getting your friendship

You are doing the same thing even before your last paragraph. Come on, slide, I know your health condition may be affecting your cognitive abilities, but most here in the middle or in opposition to your position are impressed with how you are making our point for us.

Just in citing a three-year drought as indication of climate change, you highlight the climate change enthusiasts tendency to go off the deep end at any weather event. A cursory examination of History would highlight that many such multi-year droughts have existed in the climate record since before CO2 could have been an influence. The Dust Bowl in the United States, comes to mind immediately.

Again I know you have some health issues but I think those issues are helping to expose the psychology underlying the climate change enthusiasts mentality.

So keep putting it out there, those in the middle and in opposition to your position do not want you to stop.

[Matteo V]

Nobel Prize-winning scientist Frances Arnold retracts paper



https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50989423

Maybe, Eminem, you possibly caught the most illuminating part of the article. but I think you missed it, or you would have mentioned it.

This scientist is actually being admired for her honesty. I don't know what card she had to play to turn this around into something positive, but I know that many scientists without that card to play would have never been able to turn this into something that would actually gain them positive recognition. So there you go. Science is politics.

[marlboroughman]

I think we treat women differently or not equally and we start to see "results". This article continues the cover up.

[foilholio]

Maybe social justice is playing a part. She almost looks trans, with that bone structure on the face. What a fucked up world we live in. Googling "reproducibility crisis", it is a huge issue. Any of the few scientists that find a mistake and correct it have to be commended. The fact is most are making mistakes and not correcting them. The words scientific literature and peer review to me have little credibility anymore. I am now questioning the validity of any study I read. Not that I didn't look for holes in method before, but now we know that what is stated may not be as was done.

[Matteo V]

Wait.....what is that machine in the background of that pic.......I think I saw that in a..........

And Nobel prize??? Doesn't Al Gore have a vending machine for those in his private jet?

[marlboroughman]

The climate protesters strike again. They always know better.

https://caldronpool.com/abc-deletes-sto ... fires/amp/

[marlboroughman]

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-phil ... SKBN1ZB07K

[marlboroughman]

Slide, you wanna go back to 1937?

[slide]

I thought you might like this one , birmingham uk , is to only allow private cars into the city from now on