Here you can exchange your experience and datas about your home build boards
-
bay surfer
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 6:30 pm
- Local Beach: The Dam Beach
- Favorite Beaches: Lake Michigan Beaches, OBX
- Gear: Airush, Switch, Pansh, Kites, LF boards, Home Brewed Foils and boards
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Traverse City, MI usa
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
15 times
Postby bay surfer » Fri Jun 26, 2020 5:42 pm
revhed wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:13 am
Why anyone would choose Xps as core vs Eps is not understood.
XPS is Waterproof vs EPS Not so much, Pink Ridged verses White crumbly.
Both are cheap, both can be sanded down and shaped fast.
- These users thanked the author bay surfer for the post:
- revhed (Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:44 pm)
-
revhed
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:15 pm
- Local Beach: france
- Gear: kites
- Location: France
-
Has thanked:
106 times
-
Been thanked:
34 times
Postby revhed » Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:56 pm
bay surfer wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 5:42 pm
revhed wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:13 am
Why anyone would choose Xps as core vs Eps is not understood.
XPS is Waterproof vs EPS Not so much, Pink Ridged verses White crumbly.
Both are cheap, both can be sanded down and shaped fast.
Interesting we, I are maybe lost in translation.
My understanding was X meaning Expanded and E meaning extruded.
That said,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polystyre ... rene_(EPS)
I had understood all eXpanded was not water proof, open cell, and ALL extruded was closed cell therefore waterproof, this is not clear to me now!
Exactly why words and letters need understanding for accurate communication.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polystyre ... rene_(EPS)
Most of the older, some new, cheaper cores we see are expanded pellets that are not closed cell therefore absorb water.
I need to read and study up because what I thought I knew was lacking for sure!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Styrofoam
I see that even some higher quality Extruded is not so waterproof, I was unaware.
Again thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Time to read and learn!
R H
-
TomW
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:43 pm
- Kiting since: 2001
- Local Beach: Vejbystrand, Lomma
- Gear: TW Surfboards hydrofoil board 110
Gong Veloce M, 100cm carbon mast
Ozone Hyperlink V1 7m
Hyperlink V2 9m, 13m
Concept Air Wave 4,5m
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Sweden
-
Has thanked:
53 times
-
Been thanked:
193 times
Postby TomW » Fri Jun 26, 2020 7:14 pm
EPS = expanded polystyrene. It is beads. The water gets soaked up in between the beads, and I guess into beads too.
XPS = extruded polystyrene. It doesn't have bead structure. But it will absorb water.
PU = polyurethane foam used in some surfboard blanks. It will absorb water too. But not as much.
Corecell, airex, divinycell are PU foams, closed cell and generally higher density, but you can get them from 30kg/m2 and up to like wood density. They will absorb water too, but being higher density, less so.
Most manufacturers state percentages of absorption in spec sheets if you dig.
-
jaros
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 1:00 am
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Slovenia
-
Has thanked:
33 times
-
Been thanked:
20 times
Postby jaros » Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:13 pm
XPS is used in building constuction as thermal insolation where the insolation is in contact with water (underground walls for example), so I highly doubt it absorbs any water. Old polyurethane cores do absorb it for sure.
But, there is something else wrong with the construction of the board, if water gets to the core material...
-
Trent hink
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:59 am
- Kiting since: 1998
- Weight: 83 kg.
- Local Beach: Nokomis beach, Turtle beach, Venice inlet, lido key
- Style: Creepy old man
- Gear: Peak4, LF, solo, Moses 633 hydrofoil, couple of surfboards, a twintip I made in 2008.
- Brand Affiliation: once made an attempt to manufacture and market "Anomaly" twin-tip boards.
-
Has thanked:
317 times
-
Been thanked:
254 times
Postby Trent hink » Fri Jun 26, 2020 8:25 pm
Xps has unacceptably low shear strength. It can work, but it will fail if the board has any flex. Surfboard builders who have tried it usually say it does not bond well and is prone to delamination. However, it bonds fine with epoxy. It just fails in shear right at the foam-glass interface. I learned this the hard way.
For a sandwich construction it can work fine.
Eps foam can work fine too, and in higher densities it is not so prone to absorbing water. But the kind you can buy as insulation at Cheapo Depot is around 3/4 pound per cubic foot and will suck water like crazy. For a reasonable non-sandwich construction, you really need something around 2 pounds per cubic foot.
I suggest it is best not to cheap out on your choice of core material, unless you really know what you are doing. At the very least, do not combine cheap foam with expensive reinforcements, unless you are doing a sandwich construction.
-
alpaia
- Medium Poster
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2020 9:15 pm
- Local Beach: monteynard
- Favorite Beaches: kerhiilio almanarre leucate
- Style: relaxed
- Gear: naish kites diy boards
- Brand Affiliation: None
-
Has thanked:
18 times
-
Been thanked:
35 times
Postby alpaia » Fri Jun 26, 2020 9:17 pm
Hello I remember reading a lot about xps vs eps, and disappointments with XPS. I have used it anyway. Here is what I learned, as a garage builder :
-good EPS +epoxy is the right combination everybody uses but soaks water after any leak (ding)
-XPS is a closed cell foam which does not absorb water, higher density (35kg / m3 average), stiffer, and quite even texture to shape (no beads)
-XPS has reported issues, mainly I think because it is an insulation material not necessarily produced in a way to bond with epoxy etc, so results can vary :
-the extrusion process is easier with some additives (unknown) which are added at the producer's discretion and can prevent bond with epoxy
-the closed cell contains gas bubbles that can de-gas under heat and delam the board
-the foam is dense and stiff but as mentioned earlier shear strength is not great so the foam just beneath the laminate can delam
To mitigate above limitations, receipes I used (found searching on swaylocks etc) were :
-for an epoxy board, very rough sanding (6 or 40 grit) before glassing to improve bond
Then the receipe I found, works for me, might not for you but I am happy to share :
-for a surf, I glued wood skins on the blank with PU glue (like gorilla or PUR501)
-I mean vacuum bagging for the glueing, applying 150g/m2 on the wood side only - much quicker than vacuum bagging epoxy sandwich
-then glassed on the wood after putting rails on etc
-so it is not a real sandwich (no glass below wood)
-but the wood skin - PU glue - XPS bond seems really strong as the PU glue is more elastic than epoxy so that seems to reduce shear stress.
I have used the above surf for 2 years (strong wind, chop, banged into rocks, left in heat in the car) no trouble
Hope this helps
-
bay surfer
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 6:30 pm
- Local Beach: The Dam Beach
- Favorite Beaches: Lake Michigan Beaches, OBX
- Gear: Airush, Switch, Pansh, Kites, LF boards, Home Brewed Foils and boards
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Traverse City, MI usa
-
Has thanked:
0
-
Been thanked:
15 times
Postby bay surfer » Fri Jun 26, 2020 11:00 pm
From watching video of XPS board building and my experience, final shaping is with 60 grit sandpaper, final surface is very rough and has small tears which the epoxy gets into and should help with the sheering problem, I used wood stringers glued to the XPS with PU glue so epoxy also has the wood to adhere to which should help.
-
revhed
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1373
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 6:15 pm
- Local Beach: france
- Gear: kites
- Location: France
-
Has thanked:
106 times
-
Been thanked:
34 times
Postby revhed » Sat Jun 27, 2020 9:45 am
eXtruded poly core tips
Place in direct sun to out gas.
Cut planform, shape rails.
I use rough wood file to leave very textured surface everywhere, rougher than any sand paper, for depth.
Mastic, epoxy on the thinner viscosity microballon to aide sheer strength, again everywhere, spatula applied applying hard pressure.
Carbon layup, impregged plastic sleeve method pressed and pulled firm, black transparent everywhere.
overlap seams, vac sack , rocker table using slow cure epoxy.
6 boards done like this over 8 yeras never delam or failure.
Time consuming but using carbon shoots and standard Extruded for construction insulation is low cost.
R H
-
TomW
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:43 pm
- Kiting since: 2001
- Local Beach: Vejbystrand, Lomma
- Gear: TW Surfboards hydrofoil board 110
Gong Veloce M, 100cm carbon mast
Ozone Hyperlink V1 7m
Hyperlink V2 9m, 13m
Concept Air Wave 4,5m
- Brand Affiliation: None
- Location: Sweden
-
Has thanked:
53 times
-
Been thanked:
193 times
Postby TomW » Sat Jun 27, 2020 10:56 pm
I know I am nit picking, but all foam will absorb water. Read the spec sheets.
But for all practical purposes PU and xps are less of a problem. If you get a ding keep riding and fix it after your session. If you have eps and get a ding, get out of the water and tape it, then continue. Fix after your session.
Xps works ok for garage builders. Good advice here. Follow it and it will work.
-
Trent hink
- Very Frequent Poster
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:59 am
- Kiting since: 1998
- Weight: 83 kg.
- Local Beach: Nokomis beach, Turtle beach, Venice inlet, lido key
- Style: Creepy old man
- Gear: Peak4, LF, solo, Moses 633 hydrofoil, couple of surfboards, a twintip I made in 2008.
- Brand Affiliation: once made an attempt to manufacture and market "Anomaly" twin-tip boards.
-
Has thanked:
317 times
-
Been thanked:
254 times
Postby Trent hink » Sun Jun 28, 2020 1:22 am
Clear packing tape: the session savior!
Return to “Gear Builders”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 161 guests