Agree fully Herman with the fixed bridle versus depower.
But things might "trick" us it seems?
jakemore, regarding the 5 m2 Peak4 versus a guy on the 8 m2 Soul:
He is not that experienced, and had not used his 8 much, but can foil and carve quite okay, and he is 85-90 kg.
So he took a 12 m2 Soul instead, and we rode at the same time, both having fun.
Same wing size, he 10 kg heavier.
Still, I could not understand how it could be fun with a 12 m2 (he dont jump or tack or go fast or anything), but apparently we both had fun, me on the low end with a 5 m2, but my next was an 8 (back then - thank god for the 6), so way more fun carving around underpowered in supersmall waves with the 5, than powered with the 8.
And having read some of the posts in here, I see the same pattern now and then, those riding double skin kites (not racing) use somewhat bigger sized kites than the Peak4 riders, instead of smaller as one would think, because of more spike and efficiency.
But it COULD simply be difference in not only liking, but also experience? (given we use somewhat the same relative wing sizes and compensate for weight)
Like you say jakemore, you think there would be a slight favor (or equal) Hyperlink versus Peak4 both in 5 m2.
This is what I dont understand, unless the design on purpose is made with less power to gain more range, but not sure this is true...
FRS in 6 m2, how does it compare to a 6 m2 Peak4 in lowend?
It should be better, if a more effective double skin kite, not lower AR.
Unless.... ???
And are there some small monsters with HUGE peak power, that can move the low end?
Like the Nasa and Long Star and others?
All kites are different, so this combined with different liking and experience, could also be the reason we see so many mixed signals regarding kite sizes.
Peter